“marginally significant”

Finally, we tested if the PWM predictions agreed with the allelic binding ratios in HepG2 ChIP-seq data and found a small but marginally significant correlation ( Figure 2f, r = 0.194, P = 0.052) for 101 SNPs tested in Yan et al . and reaching r = 0.235 ( P = 0.047) for a subset of 72 SNPs with significant PWM CIS-BP hits (motif P -value < 0.005), in contrast to almost zero correlation for ΔPWM Mult reported in Yan et al .

Controlling for age and sex did not alter findings for the amygdala ( r = −.51, P = .046); however, findings for the vmPFC became marginally significant ( r = −.49, P = .052).

Furthermore, IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, shows a positive correlation with ∆ miR-92a (r = 0.436, p = 0.033) and a marginally significant correlation with ∆ miR-663 (r = 0.402, p = 0.052).

The number of recurrences was 1,591 and 254 in male and female participants, with recurrence rates of 44.2% and 40.0%, respectively; the differences in these rates were marginally significant (P=0.052) ( Table 1 ).

The interaction between ethnicity of the stimuli used and internet frequency was marginally significant, F(2,83) = 3.001, p = 0.052, suggesting that masculinity preferences for the three types of male faces differed depending on the amount of internet used (Fig. 3 ).

Attitude: preparedness to screen Agreement with the AAS screening incentive was significantly positively associated with lower volume of patients attending (p = 0.008), lower number of deliveries to perform (p = 0.045), having a peer that is a victim of partner abuse (p = 0.012), and a history of having received or pursued any kind of education or information on intimate partner violence (p = 0.019), and marginally significant associated with hospital type (p = 0.052).

These results, summarized in Table 8 , showed that there was a marginally significant effect of the B allele on bolting time ( P = 0.052) but no evidence for significant effects of GA and its interaction with the B allele on bolting time (respectively, P > 0.73, P > 0.66).

Results Experiment 1 – the effects of interference during consolidation on spatial memory formation Performance of the animals during acquisition of the spatial task showed a marginally significant difference between the acquisition rates of WW and CW animals (ANOVA for repeated measures, F (1,37) = 4, p = 0.052), however, no difference was found between the acquisition rates during the last four trials ( t (37) = 1.32; N.S.; Figure 2 A), indicating that these animals have eventually acquired the task to the same level.

Before correcting for multiple testing, the signal is marginally significant in carnivores (p = 0.052) and positive, but not significant, in artiodactyls (p = 0.29).

For the mVLT, significant Group × Timepoint × Age interactions were observed for Aggregate Mean [ B = −0.29; SE ( B ) = 0.14; p = .049] and First Administration [ B = −0.76; SE ( B ) = 0.32; p = .023], with a similar marginally significant trend observed for Best Score [ B = −0.40; SE ( B ) = 0.20; p = .052].

Participants in the top category of HEI score had marginally significant lower levels of hs-CRP and ALP in crude model (P = 0.052 and P = 0.076, respectively).

PVT The ANOVA of participants’ mean RTs revealed a marginally significant main effect of aerobic fitness, F (1, 42) = 3.663, p = .052, ηp 2 = .08.

The correct sentence should read: “However, in contrast with all other measures, the predicted increase for MI results is marginally significant: MI, T2 > T1, paired t(12) = -2.16, p = 0.052.” There is an error in reference 54.

MR spectroscopy revealed a moderate and marginally significant (p = 0.052) difference of up to 10% of NAA/Cr ratio in wt mice when compared to tg mice of the same age (NAA/Cr ratio wt 0.97 ± 0.02, tg 0.89 ± 0.03). 3.3.

However, the difference of TLR4 expression in the CA1 region between the WT and WT+EtOH groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

CRNDE was also found to display a ≥2-fold differential expression and can be referred to as a marginally significant (P-value=0.052) differentially expressed lncRNA.

The differences in CV between the groups were marginally significant ( P = 0.052) (Table 3 ).

When comparing 7 minutes exposure to 3.5 minutes exposure groups, there were no significant differences in overall ratings between the two [b = -0.16, STE = 0.29, χ 2 (1) = 0.29, p = 0.59] and only a marginally significant exposure x item type interaction [χ 2 (3) = 7.74, p = 0.052].

The groups showed a marginally significant difference in offspring age ( F [2,151] = 3.01, p = 0.052).

Four or more emergency room visits were marginally significant, with lower likelihood compared to no visits ( p = .052).

This analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction between relationship history and evolutionary information ( F (1,195) = 4.80, p = 0.052, partial η 2 = .018), and a significant main effect of partner history ( F (1.195) = 7.19, p = .008, partial η 2 = .034).

In the peri-COVID-19 group, the interaction between touch and object was marginally significant ( F (1, 42) = 4.004, P = .052, partial η 2 = .087).

An ANOVA revealed that the number of place intrusion errors committed between groups was marginally significant on Day 1, F (1,68) = 3.92, P = 0.052, η 2 = 0.05 (Young M = 0.05 SD = 0.22; Old M = 0.20 SD = 0.41) and reached significance on Day 2, F (1,68) = 4.59, P < 0.05, η 2 = 0.06 (Young M = 0.03, SD = 0.16; Old M = 0.20 SD = 0.48).

At the phylum level, soil pH showed a marginally significant effect on fungal community structure ( Figure 7 b, p = 0.052), suggesting a potential but relatively weak influence.

The main effect of the prime-target hemifield was marginally significant, F (1, 10) = 4.85, p = 0.052.