Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .0511.0× alphagold
This again resulted in a significant difference between ascending and central presentation direction (β = −.18 [−.32, −.04], t = −2.47, p = .014), and a marginally significant difference between central and descending presentation direction (β = .14 [.00, .28], t = 1.95, p = .051) and a significant effect for sentence spatial location values (β = .31 [.16, .46], t = 4.16, p < .001).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
There was a marginally significant interaction between time and HIRI on Lac 3 (F = 4.338, p = 0.051, Supplementary Table S4 ), with mean comparisons indicating a decrease in Lac 3 enrichment in the HIRI group compared to the control at ZT0, but a significant increase at ZT12 post-HIRI ( Supplementary Figure S1A ).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
For muscle activation , a significant difference emerged in cluster 6, t (189) = 2.11, 95% CI [0.0011, 0.0326], p = 0.036, Cohen’s d = 0.15, and a marginally significant difference in cluster 10, t (205) = 1.96, 95% CI [−0.0001, 0.0238], p = 0.051, Cohen’s d = 0.14.
Facial mimicry predicts preference.
Commun Psychol · 2025 · PMC12657900
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the multivariable Cox regression model including T-stage, N-stage, clinical stage, surgical margins, and the status of C228T for overall survival, clinical stage remained significant (HR = 2.373; 95% CI: 1.072–5.256; p = 0.033) and the status of C228T was marginally significant (HR = 2.352; 95% CI: 0.995–5.558; p = 0.051).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In contrast, honey bees showed a marginally significant difference in pollen deposition per visit between downward (29.8 ± 3.0, N = 45) and upward flowers (21.9 ± 2.5, N = 33; Wald χ 2 = 3.808, p = 0.051; Figure 3b ). 3.4 Effects of Flower Orientation on Pollen Viability and Stigma Receptivity Pollen viability in P. cyrtonema was significantly affected by sampling time, floral orientation and weather conditions (sunlight vs. rainwater exposure; Table 1 ; Figure 4 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
As displayed in the Supplementary Materials (Table S4 ), all findings remained significant ( p < 0.01), except for the direct daily association between NO 2 and fatigue which became marginally significant ( p = 0.051) but continued to be qualified by the significant interaction.