“marginally significant”

The increase was marginally significant ( P < .051). 3.2.

The vigorous PA MET was marginally significant: F (1,39) = 4.06 and p = 0.051.

A negatively correlation was observed with HDL, although this was marginally significant ( p = 0.051) ( Table 2 ).

A one-way ANOVA of the percent of respondents with children under 18 was marginally significant ( p = .051), with “little bit of everything” and “low demand” caregivers containing a higher percent of caregivers with children under age 18 compared to “the managers” and “hands-on” caregivers.

In the NT group, the correlation between AQ total scores and log-ratio scores was negative and marginally significant ( r = −.27, p =.051, 95% CI [-0.51, 0.00]).

The HC3 model confirmed these patterns and provided estimates of their magnitude: taking freeze-dried samples as the reference, roasting caused the largest shift in PC1 ( p < 0.001), while oven-drying was marginally significant ( p = 0.051), suggesting a trend toward intensified thermal transformations.

In the total filled area control, cardinality knowledge was the only significant predictor when children saw comparisons involving the 2:3 (β = 0.62; p = 0.005) and 3:4 (β = 0.73; p < 0.001) ratios, while in the 1:2 ratio, cardinality knowledge was marginally significant (β = 0.44; p = 0.051): CP-knowers are better at discriminating two quantities involving 2:3 and 3:4 ratios than non-CP-knowers.

As Figure 7b shows, age-controlled Spearman’s correlation revealed a marginally significant correlation between greater activation and better preserved WM performance (partial ρ = 0.347, p = 0.051).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between the Word Category factor and the topographical variable Superior–Inferior ( F 14, 238 = 1.998, ε = 0.570, P < 0.051).

Descriptives The prevalence of AjD was 25.6% ( n = 81), with a marginally significant higher proportion of women (30.7%) being diagnosed than men (21.1%; χ 2 (1) = 3.80, p = .051).

The same pattern was found for high probability targets (19.5%, 95% CI [15.3,24.5]), and this is marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Macrosomia was marginally significant (AOR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 10.9; p = 0.051).

Sensitivity was highest in the tactile combined-level method (99.99%), but was not significantly different from the visual combined-level method (89.17%), as shown in Figure 3A . In Figure 3B , the level effect for specificity was marginally significant ( F = 6.840, P = .051), but the modality effect was not statistically significant ( F = 1.314, P = .351).

After the ethnicity stratification analysis, the above phenomenon was found to be significant in Asian populations (OR = 0.686, 95% CI = 0.633–0.744, P < .001), marginally significant in Caucasians (OR = 0.887, 95% CI = 0.786–1.001, P = .051), and not significant in other populations (OR = 0.851, 95% CI = 0.558–1.297, P = .452).

The interaction between habitat and years was marginally significant (β = 0.140 ± 0.129, p = 0.051), suggesting that recovery is faster in dry moor habitats.

Time-Lagged Effects The cross-lagged parameters indicated that age 15 bullying victimization was significantly and positively associated with age 17 suicidal ideation in all tested models ( βs = 0.09–0.10, ps < 0.050), with the exception of models including both anxiety symptoms and alcohol use that showed a marginally significant effect (anxiety symptoms and beer/alcopops model: β = 0.08, p = 0.051; anxiety symptoms and spirits model: β = 0.08, p = 0.055).

There was marginally significant association between good blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and patients with diabetes and the physical component of the perceived health (p = 0.051).

Our findings showed that the expression of iNOS was upregulated in the HFD group compared to the SCD group, even though the difference was marginally significant (P = 0.051, Figure 1C ).

Only figural elaboration showed a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.051).

We included only FTO, KCNJ11, CDKL1 , and SLC30A in Tables 5A because the five SNPs (rs11643744 in FTO (model 1 p -value = 0.024 and model 2 p -value = 0.02), rs9922047 in FTO (model 1 p -value = 0.002 and model 2 p -value = 0.05), and rs2237988 in KCNJ11 (model 1 p -value = 0.013), rs4712595 in CDKL1 (model 2 p -value = 0.03 and marginally significant ( p = 0.051) for model 1, and rs13269119 in SLC30A8 (model 2 p -value = 0.04)) in these genes were found to be significant after a multiple tests correction.

Having children under 12 years became marginally significant (-2.38, 95% CI: -4.77, 0.01; P = 0.051).

The average increase between the baseline and midprogram evaluations and between the midprogram and end of program evaluations was 10.6% and 7.7%, respectively, which in both cases is characterized as marginally significant ( P =.051 and P =.049, respectively).

Spatial memory performance A MANOVA revealed a marginally significant difference between MCI and control participants for Landmark Recognition, F (1, 32) = 4.102, MSE = 10.07, p = .051.

tubiflora , results were both marginally significant with P -value = 0.051 or 0.048, respectively) for alternative coding of inflorescence types.

Specific phobia showed a marginally significant effect for Time ( F (1, 22.67) = 4.24, p = 0.051), with a significant Time by Group interaction ( F (1, 22.67) = 5.77, p = 0.025).