“marginally significant”

Follow up analyses revealed no group differences in the right hemisphere ( p = 0.850) and a marginally significant group difference in the left hemisphere ( p = 0.051).

There were 1,203 participants with diabetes followed up regarding their treatment behavior. Higher POS were likely to seek appropriate diabetes treatment after adjustment with personal and occupational factors ( p =0.032) but became marginally significant when adjusted with night shift status ( p =0.051).

After 12 months, the reduction in score was still higher in the HHR group ( Table 2 ) although the difference was marginally significant in this case (p=0.051).

Class 2 (“high‐stable” trajectory; 8% ( n = 785)) consisted of a relatively small sample demonstrating high initial levels of externalizing behavior (raw score of 16.9) at age 9, which exhibited only a marginally significant increase over time (linear slope = 1.07, p = .051).

In this sample, the salvinorin-induced increases in STAI mean values were marginally significant ( P =.051).

When we repeated the ANOVA only on epochs 2 and 3, where a benefit of context repetition would be expected, the main effect of configuration became marginally significant (F(1,12) = 4.721, p = 0.051).

Self‐rated health was marginally significant ( b = 0.331, SE = 0.169, p = 0.051), but also demonstrated a protective effect against the negative effects of loneliness on PWB.

1a ; P = 0.021), while the gene-level genetic burden was marginally significant in the same category (P = 0.051).

Post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction revealed that, considering congruent and incongruent trials together, there was a marginally significant difference in RTs between Block 3 ( M = 547.79, SD = 15.99) and Block 1 ( M = 601.42, SD = 18.99, p = .051), and a significant difference between Block 4 ( M = 570.67, SD = 14.82) and Block 1 ( p < .05).

There was a marginally significant interaction between height and group ( F 1,49 = 3.99, p = 0.051; η p 2 = 0.075 Fig. 3 Top panel).

Results : The analysis of smooth pursuit gain in the participants revealed a marginally significant reduction between the SMA patients and the healthy controls in the horizontal direction at a frequency of 0.2 Hz ( p = 0.051), but no significant differences were observed at any other frequency or direction.

Similarly, an analysis performed on Chl indicates that CE are associated with a significant albeit modest Chl increase by 3.2% on average ( p -value = 2E −3 ), while the average Chl anomalies within AE are marginally significant ( p -value = 0.051) (Fig. 2B ).

A main effect of congruency was found, F (1,57) = 102.6, MSE = 64,955, p < 0.001, a marginally significant effect was found for group, F (2,57) = 2.64, MSE = 37,202, p = 0.051, and no significant interaction effect was found, F < 1.

The HC3 model confirmed these patterns and provided estimates of their magnitude: taking freeze-dried samples as the reference, roasting caused the largest shift in PC1 ( p < 0.001), while oven-drying was marginally significant ( p = 0.051), suggesting a trend toward intensified thermal transformations.

The post-hoc pairwise comparison of concrete samples and negative controls revealed only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051), and some concrete extracts measured lower than some extracts from sterilized control samples, indicating that some concrete samples had less DNA than what would be expected from background contamination.

Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced in the Simon task than in the Eriksen task, as reflected in a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 31) = 4.10, p = . 051, η p 2 = .12 (with p = . 812 and η p 2 < . 01 for the main effect of task).

Paths from maternal emotion regulation difficulties at 1.5 years to child socio‐emotional problems were not statistically significant at 2 years postpartum ( β = .08, CI [−.001; .18], p = .102), yet marginally significant at 3 years postpartum ( β = .13, CI [.02; .24], p = .051).

There was also a marginally significant positive effect of growing temperature on the rate of upregulation ( P = 0.051), which increased r , the parameter controlling the steepness of Eqn 5 .

Paired samples t-tests revealed that while neither the HC nor the non-responders had a significant change in amygdala activity to words of either valence following SSRI intervention (ts < 0.38, ps > 0.71, ds < 0.34), responders had a significant increase in amygdala activity to positive words (t(10) = 5.15, p < 0.001, d = 3.2) and a marginally significant decrease to negative words (t(10) = 2.19, p = 0.051, d = 0.93).

Under the toxic transplant diet, marginally significant increased methylation was observed for donor clone B7 compared to the uninoculated group ( t ratio = 2.8, P = .051) ( Fig. 7 , Table S13 ).

The molar loss of taurocholic acid decreased significantly (p=0.035), so the increased concentration of glycochenodeoxycholic acid resulted only in a marginally significant reduction in the total molar loss of bile acids (p=0.051).

Taken alone, this correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.051), but was non-signficant following Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments for multiple testing (P = 0.322).

Enhancement effect of visual letter n-back task For the “n” level, the results of the 4 × 2 mixed-design ANCOVA revealed that the effect of the baseline VWM span score covariate was marginally significant, F (1,54) = 4.000, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.069.

Moreover, patients with a caudal epidural block showed a marginally significant shorter hospital stay (0.37 days vs. 0.86 days; p = 0.051).

Haplogroup H2a2b5a has a marginally significant HEPN in males (adjusted P = 0.051) and a nonsignificant HEPN in females (nominal P = 0.077), but its effect is positive in males and negative in females, contrary to the expectation for an MC variant ( Fig. 2a ).