“marginally significant”

As shown in Figure 4B , increased cytoplasmic or membranous IGF1R-alpha protein expression, was associated with an absolute 47.5% increase in the risk of death after adjustment for all other clinicopathological parameters and this result was marginally significant (HR = 1.475, 95%CI: 1.000–2.178, p = 0.0504).

Yet, sporulation had a marginally significant effect when B. bassiana was topically applied to workers ( p = 0.0504; Figure 3 ).

Retrospective thought questionnaire Following correction for multiple comparisons, a negative association between proportion of time that ADHD group spent thinking about the future and 24hr memory retention was marginally significant (adjusted p = 0.0504).

The effect of population was smaller and marginally significant ( r 2 = 3.70 × 10 −2 , p ‐value = 5.05 × 10 −2 ).

5 a), CPL showed a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.0505), while CC, LE, and GE were significantly increased (all p < 0.05); In the theta band (Fig. 5 b), CPL was significantly decreased, and CC, LE, and GE were significantly increased (all p < 0.01); In the beta band (Fig. 5 d), CPL was significantly increased, and CC, LE, and GE were significantly decreased (all p < 0.05).

One additional miRNA was found marginally significant (has‐miR‐130a‐3p) ( P = 0.0506).

Reaction Times (RT) in Go trials The LMM for RT in correct Go trials showed a marginally significant main effect of Group [ χ 2 (1) = 3.82, p = 0.0506] and a significant two-way Group × Cue type interaction [ χ 2 (1) = 4.46, p = 0.034].

The allele × session interaction was marginally significant ( F (3.53, 801.74) = 2.47 P = 5.07 × 10 −2 , η p 2 = 0.01).

In MDA-MB-231, apoA-I was responsible for a marginally significant increase in esterified cholesterol ( P = 0.0507) (Fig. 3 a).

There was a marginally significant interaction between VOLITION and GROUP (F(1,57) = 3.98, p = 0.0507, η 2 = 0.07).

This attractive bias was still marginally significant when we restricted the analysis to the narrow time window of 163 ms with significant target decoding (163–0 ms before response, t (19) = 2.0861, p = 0.0507).

In women, the carbohydrate intake was higher in the obesity group than the nonobese group, and the association of the carbohydrate intake with the obesity risk was marginally significant ( p = 0.0508).

The prevent-1 that studied the role of this drug in preventing diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetics and Protect-1 and Protect-2 that studied the effect of the drug in halting the progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively.[ 23 24 ] Treatment with Candesartan was able to reduce the incidence of retinopathy by 18% (a marginally significant achievement P = 0.0508).

The difference of Hb between normal expression of CD55 and 10% deficiency was also significant (δ=−1.4392 g/dl, 95%CI : −2.6356 to −0.2428 g/dl , p =0.0189), while between normal expression and 25% deficiency was marginally significant (δ=−1.5924 g/dl, p =0.0508, Mann-Whitney test).

A one‐way ANOVA indicated a marginally significant effect of site type on African white‐backed vulture counts ( F 2 , 1400 = 2.99, p = 0.0508).

Additionally, the relationship between initial 25-OH vitamin D and response to treatment was investigated and a marginally significant ( P = 0.0509) result was found, with responders tending to be patients who have higher initial levels ( Fig. 3C ).

The principal finding was a distinct, though marginally significant, pattern of post-intervention resting-state activity in the EE group, characterized by increased frontal midline theta ( p = 0.051) and decreased alpha power ( p = 0.059), suggesting a unique neurophysiological signature.

In addition, haplotype G-T had a marginally significant interaction with dietary carbohydrate ( P = 0.051) for type 2 diabetes risk.

Results revealed behavioral working memory to be a significant predictor of BMI change ( β = .31, p = .03), and a marginally significant contribution of self-reported inhibition was found ( β = − .23, p = .051).

4.5.2 Differences in the degree of recognition of Xin in Chinese culture among different groups 4.5.2.1 Differences by gender A marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) in the recognition of Xin in Chinese culture was observed ( Table 7 ), with males having a lower degree of recognition than females.

The analysis also showed a significant main effect for public domain (F (1, 393) = 4.29, p = .039; M non-public = 4.61, SD non-public = 1.44; M public = 4.46, SD public = 1.57) and a marginally significant interaction (F (1, 393) = 3.84, p = .051).

Infants showed a marginally significant preference for the impossible events compared to the matched possible events ( M = 0.33 s, SD = 1.29, t (43) = 1.67, p = 0.051).

Although the association between Internet use and smoking status was marginally significant among women ( p = 0.051), a trend towards lower smoking rates among Internet users was observed.

Specifically, across the 60 associated coefficients, only one was significant: employment tenure had a small and marginally significant effect on motivating others ( b = –0.01, p = 0.051).

Although the overall effect of transfusion timing was marginally significant (p=0.051), its nonlinear component reached statistical significance (p=0.033), indicating a potential critical risk window.