“marginally significant”

Correlation between foveal retinal sensitivity and foveal cystoid space intensity was moderate and marginally significant ( r = −0.43, P = 0.05).

The difference between nights in systolic BP (SBP) measured by the wrist‐device was not significant (1.6±7.0 mmHg, p = .124), while the difference in diastolic BP (DBP) was marginally significant (1.4±4.9 mmHg, p = .050).

The gap in body dissemination frequency between immunocompetent combined with mildly immunocompromised (5.26%, 3/57) and severe immunocompromised (19.0%, 8/42) was marginally significant ( P = .05).

One exception was an average 19% decrease in grain yield in the Δgli-A2 deletion, which was marginally significant in the Dunnett test ( P < 0.05, Fig. 4 A).

We initially specified a two-sided selection using p-value cutoffs driving publication bias for significant and marginally significant studies as p = 0.05 and 0.1.

In addition, trust in people had a marginally significant effect on social empathy ( β = 0.100, p ≤ 0.05), and had a significant effect on subjective well-being ( β = 0.223, p < 0.001).

In the fixed token production schedule, there was a significant positive correlation between the indifference point and the mean balance ( r s = 0.53, p = 0.04) but marginally significant with the mean peak point ( r s = 0.49, p = 0.05).

Regarding physical performance, lower-limb strength and the sit-and-reach test score increased significantly in the intervention group, whereas a significant decrease in grip strength and a marginally significant decrease in 6-minute walking distance ( P = 0.05) were observed in the control group; each of these changes was significantly different from the corresponding change in the other group.

Among participants with a mean age under 40 years (Steffens 2022 and Evman 2023), PRP treatment resulted in a marginally significant improvement in olfactory function compared to controls (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.00 to 4.20, p = 0.05).

The positive association between depressive symptoms and problematic social media use was marginally significant in the adjusted multiple linear regression analysis (β=.11; P =.05).

However, they did show a marginally significant (ρ = -0.091; p = 0.05) negative correlation between reflectance and altitude.

There was also a marginally significant group*time interaction for executive function ( p = 0.05).

Likewise, a small marginally significant increase in plasma carotenoids (0.14 μmol/L difference from baseline to 6 months, p = 0.05) indicated increasing fruit and vegetable intake ( Table 5 ).

No significant difference was observed in other complications, THC, LOS, and mortality rates before and after PSM although marginally significant in 1-year and 2-year mortalities after PSM ( p =0.050 and p =0.053, respectively), which need to be interpreted with caution.

Microcalcification on mammography was seen in 41.3% (19/46) of patients in the non-upgrade group and in 77.8% (7/9) of patients in the upgrade group, which indicated a marginally significant difference (p=0.05).

IBD and F ST class permutation test over full distance range All slopes of the regression with ln(distance) over the full range for all populations across Europe (2,518 km) and within each of the coastlines (563–1,497 km) were highly significant for either Euclidean distances or for sea current distances (Table 3 ), except for those of the Tyrrhenian Sea (not significant for Euclidean distances although marginally significant at p < 0.05 when considering sea current distances).

Following this up with t -tests revealed a non-significant reduction in the Vitamin-B12 group ( t (12) = 0.64, p = 0.53, d = 0.18), a marginally significant reduction in the placebo group ( t (8) = 2.3, p = 0.05, d = 0.74), and a highly significant reduction in the Vitamin-B6 group ( t (16) = 4.04, p < 0.001, d = 0.98).

Without the presence of an alpha value, the P value can be interpreted as P > 0.10, not significant; P ≤ 0.10, marginally significant; P ≤ 0.05, significant; and P ≤ 0.01, highly significant.

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant between P > 0.05 and P ≤ 0.10. 3.

The first step was to screen the genes using Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify any genes that had at least a marginally significant association ( p < 0.05) with the outcome (OS).

The results, after adjusting for covariates, indicated that adolescents who experienced parental divorce reported higher internalizing problems than did adolescents who remained in intact families, but the difference was marginally significant, F = 3.64, p = .05 (see Fig. 1 ).

Similar to the trends in the any-error data, sensible non-target errors were more common among listeners with CIs than those with TH ( z = 2.3, p = 0.02), and these errors were mitigated by seeing the talker’s mouth for listeners with CIs but not those with TH (marginally significant interaction between mouth visibility and hearing group; z = 2.0, p = 0.05).

Gender also had a marginally significant interaction with the within subjects factor F (1, 99) = 3.64 ( p = 0.05) η 2 = 0.04, observed power was 0.47 and this interaction effect is presented in Figure 4 .

A higher occurrence of MSEs was observed in the comparator group, which was marginally significant (p=0·05).

Therefore, marginally significant results close to p = 0.05 must be interpreted with caution as preliminary trends that require validation in larger, multi-center cohorts.