“marginally significant”

While none of the predictor variables were statistically significant in 2012, moon and date were marginally significant (0.10 < p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

First, the associations of the selected risk alleles were marginally significant [α (significance level of Bonferroni correction for multiple testing < P <0.05; α=0.05/35 SNPs/three genetic models=0.00048).

Effects are significant when p ≤ 0.05, while marginally significant when p > 0.05 and p < 0.1.

When including sociodemographic variables as covariates, diagnostic group differences remained marginally significant ( F 4, 326 =2.41, P =.05).

Marginally significant results (assuming p < 0.05) are seen between specific groups with respect to their intra-sample diversity, evenness, and richness metrics.

Only when we controlled for the sex and age of the child did the risk of being tall-for-age for children at high risk of poverty compared to those at no risk become marginally significant but positive (OR = 1.08, p < 0.050).

While CRP levels, modelled as a continuous variable, were not associated with OLD, we did find a marginally significant association at CRP levels above 9 mg/L (aOR = 2.55, 95%CI 0.97–6.76, p = 0.05) ( S1 Table ).

Finally, there was no effect of novelty on time spent encountering the objects ( t 1 = 1.07, p = 0.29), but time spent inside each zone was marginally significant ( t 1 = 1.95, p = 0.05); regardless of treatment, object type or location, fish spent more time in the novel object zone than the familiar zone (in seconds; novel: 293.57 ± 11.84; familiar: 257.82 ± 14.09).

In the Cox regression analysis, the occurrence of metastasis had a marginally significant association with tumor thickness (B = 0.227, 95-CI: 0.111 to 0.343, p -value = 0.050), and there was no significant association between recurrence of the tumor ( p -value = 0.662) or TNM staging ( p -value = 0.32) and the incidence of metastasis.

Compared to the TDCs, the mean R 2 value of the whole cortex in patients with ASD was significantly reduced ( p = 0.048, Figure 3 A), and decreases in R 2 values in SMN, CCN, and ventral attention network (VAN) were marginally significant ( p < 0.05, FDR correction failed).

A one-tailed paired t-test comparing DBS-ON and DBS-OFF conditions showed a marginally significant difference (t = 2.04, df = 5, p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.27]; Fig. 3F ), suggesting a possible, though limited, reinforcing effect.

Patients with decreasing eGFR had higher transgelin levels (median 106.6 versus 83.9 ng/mL), although the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant difference in T2 PTSD symptoms ( t [164] = 1.97, p = 0.05), with those participating at both times reporting lower symptom levels ( M = 32.64, SD = 16.93) compared to those who only participated at T2 ( M = 39.16, SD = 19.48).

Deleting Demmer’s study [ 63 ] would reduce the effect size and obtain a marginally significant result (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.99–1.39, p > 0.05).

The interaction effect between the pre-post assignment and nationality is marginally significant (F = 4.25, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.15), while the three-way interaction involving pre-post assignment, individualism-collectivism orientation, and nationality is also marginally significant (F = 1.80, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.06).

In 2011, we found a marginally significant effect of management zone (log‐likelihood test between the model including management zone and the null model: χ 2 = 5.9, df = 2, and p = .05) and no significant effect of initial oak height at planting (log‐likelihood test between the model including height and the null model: χ 2 = 0.35, df = 1, and p = .85) on the risk of being browsed by deer.

We observed a weak and marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.16, R a d j 2 = 0 . 02 , t = 1.97, p = .05), which was driven by the shape word condition ( r = 0.24, R a d j 2 = 0 . 05 , t = 2.11, p < .05).

RN neurons exhibited a unimodal distribution that was marginally insignificant (unimodal Rayleigh test, p = 0.06, r = 0.31, PTD = 288°), whereas the bimodal distribution was marginally significant (Figure 6A ; bimodal Rayleigh test, p < 0.05, r = 0.33, PTD axes = 123–303°).

However, there was a marginally significant interaction between group and session ( P < 0.05) such that the probiotic group showed improved accuracy in recognising facial expressions following the intervention.

In a study conducted by Head, marginally significant ( p = 0.05) increases in overall consumption were observed using weighed plate waste in four North Carolina elementary schools exposed to nutrition education with a focus on basic nutrition and dietary patterns [ 107 ].

The results showed that friendship quality did not play a significant role in predicting loneliness for typically developing students, students with ASD and students with motor and/or sensory disabilities, although there was a marginally significant effect of friendship quality on loneliness (−0.21, p < 0.05) for the entire group of students with SEN (special education needs).

Six OTUs had an abundance of more than 2% of the total sequences, and four of these (OTU00026, OTU00034, OTU00037, and OTU00046, all classified as Ascomycota) showed a significant or marginally significant difference between the Early Stage and the Late Stage (p ≤ 0.05).

However, a marginally significant main effect of feature, F (2,57) = 3.15, p = 0.05, ƞ p 2 = 0.10, and an interaction of feature and instruction was found, F (2,57) = 8.72, p < 0.001, ƞ p 2 = 0.23.

Male gender remained significantly associated with readmissions ( P = 0.02) and marginally significant with complications ( P = 0.05) in the ERCP subgroup.

Four compounds of the secondary metabolism of plants showed significant or marginally significant changes in response to Pc ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.10, respectively; Table 4 ).