“marginally significant”

The equality of the proportions between our study population and the TCGA, GENIE‐NH, and GENIE‐H were evaluated using the two‐sample proportion test (prtesti); a p ‐value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant or marginally significant ( p ‐value = 0.05).

All means are presented ± 1 SE and considered marginally significant if 0.10 < P > 0.05, and significant at P ≤ 0.05.

At 2 hours after reperfusion, EMPA pretreatment led to a significant reduction of MMP-2 and a marginally significant increase ( P = 0.05) in TIMP-1 protein levels, whereas no alterations were detected in ICAM-1 ( Figures 6E and 6G ).

The difference in SE for competence was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Health in medical care (Panel E) exhibits marginally significant positive impact (PcPatap: β = 1.349, p < 0.05, PcPatau: β = 0.810, p < 0.10), implying that healthcare infrastructure and accessibility are fundamental to urban innovation.

Furthermore, Discomfort was marginally significant ( p > 0.05), which meant that girls felt more comfortable than boys during their social performance.

Gene set enrichment analyses were performed using clusterProfiler [ 93 ] using input genes that were marginally significant (at p < 0.05) stratified by directionality – subsequent gene set enrichment results adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate. 2.13.

A marginally significant negative correlation was also observed between HIL and pterygium thickness ( r = −0.178, P = 0.050) in this cohort (Table 5 ).

Early (OR 0.392; P <0.05) instars of Culex were more likely to be sampled in non-intervention habitats than in habitats applied with Bti , while the late instars abundance was marginally significant (OR 0.509; P =0.05).

The present meta-analysis indicated a marginally significant difference between the two groups, with better outcomes with ACE inhibitors (fixed-effects model analysis: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00; P=0.05; I 2 =44%; Fig. 4 ).

The finding of marginally significant high prevalence of FT in patients with late onset psoriasis compared to early onset disease (50% and 29.2% respectively; p=0.05) may be partly explained by the reported successively increasing prevalence of FT with advancing age ( 24 ).

A marginally significant association was found in retrospective cohorts (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.00–3.17, P = 0.05, I 2 = 91%), whereas no significant associations were identified in women aged >32 years (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 0.89–4.83, P = 0.09, I 2 = 99%) or small-sample studies (<1,000 participants, OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 0.54–5.22, P = 0.37, I 2 = 69%).

Six OTUs had an abundance of more than 2% of the total sequences, and four of these (OTU00026, OTU00034, OTU00037, and OTU00046, all classified as Ascomycota) showed a significant or marginally significant difference between the Early Stage and the Late Stage (p ≤ 0.05).

Despite this significant enhancement, which likely improves the signal-to-noise ratio of frequency input to neurons in slow RT trials, analyses of the correlation between the theta–alpha IF and neural spike rate illustrates a marginally significant negative correlation in fast RT trials ( r = − 0.196, p ≈ 0.05, Spearman correlation, Fig. 5 C) but no significant correlation in the slow RT trials ( r = 0.09 , p = 0.35, Spearman correlation, Fig. 5 D).

As for cheating on exams, Model 3 showed a marginally significant negative association for extraversion ( b = –0.18, SE = 0.11, t = –1.97, p < .05), indicating that higher extraversion tended to decrease the probability of cheating.

T 3 - and vehicle-injected males also showed a marginally significant difference in their preferences ( W (32) = 61, p < 0.05, d = 0.98).

On the other hand, leaves as a food type have a positive and marginally significant effect on food intake (Estimate = −0.02, SE = 0.01, t -value = −1.95, p < 0.05).

Breaking the interaction down, there was a marginally significant effect for inhibition control ability in A-2 condition, χ 2 = 3.74, df = 1, p = 0.05, suggesting better inhibition control ability indicates faster response in the A-2 condition.

The model showed a marginally significant and positive relationship between continuation and PTSD symptoms in W3 ( β = 0.08, p = 0.05), but not with PTSD symptoms in W4.

The SnIPRe-like analysis gave similar results, with strongly negative genome-wide and immune-pathway estimates of the selective effect, but with substantially higher and marginally significant estimates for RNAi genes ( fig. 8 B ; mean selection effect = 0.015; P < 0.05).

An additional regression analysis conducted on 50% of bilingual children with highest weighted exposure and on matched monolingual peers revealed a main effect of Age ( p < 0.01), but only a marginally significant effect of Group ( p = 0.05), and no interaction of Group and Age ( p = 0.89).

An independent t-test showed that the difference (.657, 95% CI [.010, 1.303]) in the SOC-R total score between gender was marginally significant, ( t (2371) = 1.99, p = .05), with males ( M = 45.16) showing slightly higher scores than females ( M = 44.50).

The interaction between treatment type and time was marginally significant ( F =3.29, P =0.05).

This finding should be interpreted with considerable caution for several reasons: First, the confidence interval is wide and marginally significant ( p = 0.05), making it compatible with no effect.

A trend towards higher eczema presentation was reported in Group B infants, but the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).