Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
eCPMV Immunotherapy Induces Changes in Cytokine Plasma Levels Of the 13 cytokines analyzed, a significant decrease in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-7, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels were observed after the first eCPMV injection ( p < 0.04 for all), followed by an increase close to basal plasma levels by surgery day; a nonsignificant decline in IL-2 plasma levels was observed, and a marginally significant decrease in IL-10 by DSx ( p = 0.050) ( Table S9 ) was also observed.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
neurological manifestations, the relatively low number of newborns with nonneurological forms of the disease may have made it difficult to show this potential benefit in these specific situations, as also seen for prematurity which remains marginally significant (p = 0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Following this up with t -tests revealed a non-significant reduction in the Vitamin-B12 group ( t (12) = 0.64, p = 0.53, d = 0.18), a marginally significant reduction in the placebo group ( t (8) = 2.3, p = 0.05, d = 0.74), and a highly significant reduction in the Vitamin-B6 group ( t (16) = 4.04, p < 0.001, d = 0.98).
High-dose Vitamin-B6 reduces sensory over-responsivity.
J Psychopharmacol · 2024 · PMC11528956
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
We refer to effects as “marginally significant” when results indicate p < 0.05 but BF 10 < 3.0 (i.e., when the effect is supported by null hypothesis testing but the Bayes Factor suggests evidentiary value below our prespecified threshold).
marginally significantP= .051.0× alphagold
The patient’s rights domain score showed a marginally significant difference in the IPW-adjusted analysis (−2.60 points; 95% CI −5.16 to −0.04; P= .05) but not in the unadjusted (−2.05 points; 95% CI −4.61 to 0.52; P =.12) or MI-adjusted analyses (−2.92 points; 95% CI −6.93 to 1.09; P =.15).