Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally non-significant”

1,494 sentences · 1,494 papers · 1,908 search hits before verification

In the literature

marginally non-significantp = .0521.0× alpha
On average, women scored higher than men on the total IRI (female participants: 3.75 ± 0.05; male participants: 3.45 ± 0.04; F 1,151 = 24.38, p < 0.001; Table 1 ); this gender difference was also found for the IRI_EC ( F 1,151 = 26.83, p < .001), IRI_PD ( F 1,151 = 10.69, p < .001) and IRI_F subscales ( F 1,151 = 5.08, p = .026) but was marginally non-significant for the IRI_PT subscale ( F 1,151 = 3.84, p = .052).
marginally non-significantP = 0.05221.0× alpha
These results followed a similar pattern when the analysis was conducted only for years with a good fit to regression models, with the interaction between year and time (or distance) being highly significant ( P = 0.0001) for the temporal regression or marginally non-significant ( P = 0.0522) for the spatial regression model ( Table 4 ).
marginally non-significantp -value = 0.05271.1× alpha
Moreover, a PERMANOVA adjusted for differences in dispersion confirmed that the observed effect of sample processing strategy was marginally non-significant ( p -value = 0.0527, F = 5.50, R 2 = 0.38; Supplementary Table S7 ). 3.4 Litophyton and sediment samples maintain dominant bacterial taxa in aquarium settings The Gammaproteobacteria class typically dominated the prokaryotic communities of Litophyton specimens both in the aquarium (average relative abundance of 51%) and the Red Sea (31%), although the Red Sea presented higher variability between samples ( Figure 3A ).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0531.1× alpha
Although there was a marginally non-significant difference in body condition between treatments ( Fig S2 ; F 2,74 = 3.06, p = 0.053), T male body condition was not significantly lower than that of ASY males, who were in significantly better condition than control males (Student's t; α = 0.05).
marginally non-significantp = 0.0531.1× alpha
Heterogeneity of social impact The results of this study show that social influence has a standardized effect on behavioral intention ( β = 0.290) comparable to that of EE ( β = 0.274) and TT ( β = 0.252), but it is demonstrated a marginally non-significant ( p = 0.053, SE = 0.191).