The mean percentage of postoperative FEV 1 in the mesh-cover group was higher than that in the pleural closure group, with marginal significance ( p = 0.09).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
Clinicopathological characteristics were not significantly different between low-CD163 and high-CD163 groups, while age of diagnosis was younger in high-CD163 group than that of low-CD163 group with marginal significance (56.9±5.5 years vs. 67.5±6.8 years, P =0.09).
A notable finding was perhaps that derivation-focused MA tasks ( r = .758) appeared to produce a higher correlation, with marginal significance, than did those that had a mixed focus on derivation and inflection ( r = .513), Q = 2.870, p = .090.
The levels of fibronectin were not significantly different according to age, gender, etiologies of underlying liver disease and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, but showed a negative correlation with platelet levels with marginal significance (r = − 0.19, p = 0.09).
Among early stage ovarian cancer patients who underwent complete cytoreductive surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, the association between the expression of CLU protein in ovarian cancer tissues and several clinicopathological factors revealed that age (p = 0.83), histologic subtype (p = 0.32) were not related to CLU expression, while FIGO stage showed the relation to CLU expression with marginal significance (p = 0.09) (Table 3 ).
There was a significant difference in the distributions of d N /d S between the hits and nonhits for the six partitions ( P < 0.05) and marginal significance for the MatK partition ( P = 0.09) with the rank sum test (Wilcox test).
Moreover, the P2 amplitudes during the RS condition showed marginal significance than during the NS condition, t = 0.64, p = 0.09.
A post-hoc one-tailed z-test revealed a marginal significance difference between the standardized predictors, z = 1.3, p = .09.
The lower CC for the patient group, which suggests a higher variance, was found with marginal significance when compared to controls ( t = 1.33, p = 0.09).
Body mass index (BMI) showed marginal significance ( p = 0.09).
Results Reward sensitivity Regarding ACC, the main effect of reward magnitude obtained marginal significance, F (1, 62) = 2.91, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.05.
The main effect of performance expectancy increased ( β =.424, 95% CI 0.135-0.713), whereas the main effect of social influence decreased ( β =.262, 95% CI −0.043-0.566), with its significance level increasing to marginal significance ( P =.09).
For MDADI composite scores, odds ratios had marginal significance for both planned dose (OR = 2.02, p = 0.09) and delivered dose (OR = 2.26, p = 0.06).
The results showed that the CT in two regions had nonsignificantly different influences between GA and PT (p>0.3), but CM showed a significantly different impact from the two factors in V1 (p<0.01) and marginal significance in VOTC (p<0.09).
Subgroup analyses Table 3 shows that the intervention effect was greater in females (8.4% vs 2.3%; OR=3.91; 95% CI: 0.79–19.42) than in males (4.4% vs 5.3%, OR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.36–1.88) at 12 months and in those who were not ready to quit in 30 days (3.9% vs 1.1%; OR=3.70; 95% CI: 0.74–18.60) than those who were ready to quit in 30 days (4.0% vs 5.5%; OR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.25–2.01) at 6 months with marginal significance of interaction (both p=0.09).
In the UW plots, total soil respiratory C release was relatively higher with additional C 4 materials (5661 μg g −1 ) than with C 3 materials (5448 μg g −1 ) with marginal significance (p = 0.09), even though C 3 plant materials had a higher quality with a lower C:N ratio ( Fig. 2 ).
Effects were significantly larger for schematic than realistic games ( b = 0.45, p = .03, 95% CI [0.05, 0.84]), but this difference was attenuated to marginal significance ( b = 0.44, p = .09, 95% CI [−0.95, 0.06]) after controlling for anthropomorphism, variety of game actions, viewpoint, story relevance, and story depth game characteristic variables.
Gene E1 showed marginal significance at the level of 0.1 (p value = 0.09).
Results show that the drawings were not statistically different in size for the three measures computed: for “Me” height (M = 189.55, SD = 1389.92), t (87) = 1.279, p < .204; “Me” waist (M = 27.12, SD = 147.31), marginal significance t (86) = 1.117, p < .090; and “Me” width (M = 4.61, SD = 453.99), marginal significance t (86) = .095, p < .925.
The Linear Mixed Models revealed species-specific responses of the measured traits to the two variables linked to urbanisation, though sometimes with a marginal significance ( P < 0.09).
There was marginal significance on improvement of composite score for 2–7 days administration as compared with 0–6 h ( p = 0.09, Table 2 ).
Contrasting the two groups against non-medicated children showed a marginal significance (z = −1.7, p = 0.09) ( Table 4 ).
Moreover, the interaction of form realism and behavioral realism influenced perceived competence, presenting marginal significance (β = −0.48, p = 0.09); at the same time, perceived competence positively impacted satisfaction (β = 0.64, p < 0.001).
The risk of repeated exposure for dental nurse students was approximately 61% lower than that of hospital dentists, with marginal significance ( p = 0.09).
However, the CDO1 TaqMeth V showed marginal significance (p = 0.09) ( Table 2 ).