“marginal significance”

The infarct area was smaller in the ADSC group with marginal significance (13.9±10.6 cm 2 in the ADSC group vs. 22.7±13.2 cm 2 in the control group; p =0.085) ( Fig. 4 ).

Nuclear FOXM1 was associated with the presence of oestrogen receptor with marginal significance ( P = 0.085) but not with presence of progesterone receptor ( P = 0.702).

First, the form of current study is a literature-based analysis, which resulted in the marginal significance of publication bias in HR for OS ( P = 0.085).

The exception was the BDI comparison at follow-up, which showed marginal significance ( P = 0.085).

When considering the association patterns for each racial group, the results of transfer learning model in the African American group indicate significant associations with Baseline MD ( P = 0.008) and RNFL ( P = 0.005), whereas baseline age shows marginal significance ( P = 0.085).

pylori seropositivity in the multivariable model; however, residing in counties with low population density reached marginal significance ( P = .085).

Re-evaluation of those patients aged 75 years or older revealed that HRs increased and 95% CIs varied more, but the trend was the same as for all patients (Data are not shown).The marginal significance of an interaction between systolic BP and frailty partly supports these results ( P = 0.085 for interaction).

Use of IL-17 inhibitors showed a strong protective effect on the deterioration of psoriasis (aOR sig = 0.17) after vaccination with a marginal significance ( P = 0.085).

By multiple linear regression analyses, pre-exercise FMD showed marginal significance with male gender (β = −2.036; 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.362 to 0.289; P = 0.085).

They made more good choice in the high-blame blocks only with a marginal significance (mean good choice proportion = 0.692 vs 0.673, t [45] = 1.76, P = 0.085, confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.00 to 0.04, d = 0.3; two-tailed paired t -test; Figure 1 D, left).

Despite the insufficient resolution of the ND2 genetic distance, we found a statistically significantly negative correlation between the matrices (Mantel's r = −0.259, P = 0.0067 for SVM) but only marginal significance in RF (Mantel's r = −0.199, P = 0.0850).

Upon analyzing the data from all 23 patients, there was a marginal significance observed when comparing the BCVAs before and one year after treatment (P = 0.085).

21 , 28 , 41 , 42 In our results, for the entire cohort, and subjects without HCC at baseline, higher baseline myostatin levels were associated with significantly worse survival, and this had marginal significance ( P = 0.0855 for the entire cohort and P = 0.0778 for patients without HCC) in our multivariate analysis.

An univariate Poisson regression model, only taking into account the effect of time between baseline and follow-up MRI, revealed a marginal significance in the relationship between the EFS score at baseline and WMH progression at follow-up (IRR: 1.07; 95% C.I.: 0.99-1.16; P = .086).

Knowledge retention scores showed marginal significance [ F (1, 88) = 3.01, p = 0.086], with the video group having higher retention scores, suggesting video learning had a slight short-term memory and knowledge retention advantage.

Second, Kondoh and colleagues described that patients in the rhTM arm trended toward poorer 90-day survival than those in the non-rhTM arm with a marginal significance (rate difference for survival, −16.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), −33.8% to 0.4%]; odds ratio [OR] for survival, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.09 to 1.11]; P = 0.086) ( 1 ), although many previous observational studies reported that rhTM benefits AE-IPF survival ( 3 – 6 ).

We found that exploration decisions were associated with larger pupil size, but in marginal significance [ F (1.5200) = 2.95, β = 19.62 p = 0.086].

The main effect of emotion showed marginal significance in accuracy [ F (2, 51) = 2.580, p = 0.086, ɳ 2 p = 0.092], the pairwise comparison showed that the disgust group had a higher accuracy than the fear group ( p = 0.084, mean = 0.074), and no significant difference in response time [ F (2, 51) = 0.961, p = 0.386, ɳ 2 p = 0.036].

These genes were enriched significantly in olfactory-related functions (for example, GO:0007608 , sensory perception of smell, odds ratio (OR) = 6.46, Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-adjusted P = 2.22 × 10 −36 ; and hsa04740, olfactory transduction, OR = 7.14, BH-adjusted P = 8.35 × 10 −38 ), and at a marginal significance level in skin-related disease (for example, DOID:37, skin disease, OR = 2.33, BH-adjusted P = 0.086; and DOID:16, integumentary system disease, OR = 2.23, BH-adjusted P = 0.086; Supplementary Table 5 ).

IPI risk ≥3 was still determined as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 3.5; p<.001), while HOTAIR high showed a tendency to be related to improved survival with marginal significance (hazard ratio, 0.5; p=.086).

Inward attention increased for both groups during the condition, though only reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.086).

The results ( Table 6 ) revealed an odds ratio of 0.1851 for specialist oncologists, suggesting that such recommendations are associated with a lower likelihood of purchasing FSMPs online, with marginal significance (p = 0.086).

However, the effect sizes showed marginal significance ( p = 0.087).

Although the increase in SDNN showed only marginal significance in Week 6 ( p = .087) due to reduced statistical power, significant enhancements in SDNN ( p = .012) and RMSSD ( p = .039) were sustained through Week 8.

Compared with individuals without any sarcopenia components, those having low grip strength and/or slow gait speed without low ALMI were associated with increased risks of incident disability, and mortality or incident disability with marginal significance [HRs (95% CI): 1.4 (1.0–2.0), P = 0.087, and 1.4 (1.0–1.9), P = 0.057, respectively], but not all‐cause mortality [1.3 (0.8–2.2), P = 0.346].