“marginal significance”

The results of our immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining studies further revealed a strong correlation between the over-expression of HDAC4 and increased bladder cancer occurrence ( p < 0.001) as well as a marginal significance of increasing incidence of HDAC4 positivity seen with an increase in severity of bladder cancer ( p = 0.08).

Univariate analysis found marginal significance for soft-tissue extension (p = 0.080) ( Table 5 ).

Results We found that c-MET expression was more common in pRCC (classic) (p = .021) among papillary renal neoplasms and Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in pRCC (not otherwise specified, NOS) compared to that of pRCC (classic) and papillary neoplasm with reverse polarity (marginal significance, p = .080).

Interestingly, the rate of CRC detection was higher in smoking persons than non-smokers with marginal significance (P = 0.08).

98.22, P = 0.011), and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of the ciprofol group was significantly lower marginal significance lower than that of the propofol group (71.75 vs. 75.22, P = 0.08) after 3 min of administration.

The interaction yielded only marginal significance however (F 1,28 = 3.29, p = 0.08).

2D ), reduced mRNA levels of the cystathionine β-synthase (Cbs) gene were detected with 66.3±2.7% of controls and marginal significance (p = 0.08), but no significant differences for cystathionase (Cth) were measured (p = 0.29).

Among the TNBC population, mutations in HR-related genes were linked to a more favorable prognosis with marginal significance (log-rank, p=0.080).

A similar trend was found in the analysis of α-SMA expression with marginal significance ( p = 0.080, 28.3 m in low expression vs. 56.4 m in the high expression).

The presence of diabetes was indicated as a better prognosis factor, though with marginal significance (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95 % CI, 0.86–1.01; p = 0.08).

Risk factors for revision and mechanical failure In univariate analysis, the use of ASR implant, small-sized head, advanced stage (3B or 4), lateral extension (type C2) of osteonecrosis, and large Kerboul angle were all identified as significant risk factors of revision for any reason (P < 0.05), while female sex reached marginal significance (P = 0.080) ( Table 5 ).

Preregistered F-tests allow us to reject the null hypothesis that the effects of all 15 interventions are equal to zero [χ 2 (15) = 27.09, P = 0.03], and to reject the null hypothesis that 15 effects have the same true value at marginal significance [χ 2 (14) = 21.89, P = 0.08].

However, in the multivariate linear mixed model, the relationship between preoperative IOP and IOP at 6 months post-surgery showed marginal significance with p = 0.08.

Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that participants with marginal significance rated robots as more eerie after Interaction I ( M = 3.25, SD = 0.52) than after Interaction III ( M = 3.11, SD = 0.6), p = 0.08.

A positive blood culture suggesting a remote infection source seeding onto the leads via the blood, either originating from the device pocket or from another remote site, was associated with the larger vegetations size, albeit only with marginal significance ( p = 0.08) ( Table 1 ).

Sleep medicine showed marginal significance in telehealth patient-to-provider ratios ( P =.08) and significant changes in office visit patient-to-provider ratios ( P <.001).

We found increased CD73 levels associated with DMFS and OS, with marginal significance ( p = 0.08 and 0.13, respectively).

A comparison of the drug + devaluation versus vehicle condition in these rats reached marginal significance (devaluation × choice: F (2,6) = 3.80, p = 0.08), resulting from a significant increase in P1 and P4 choice (P1: t (5) = −4.92, p = 0.004; P4: t (5) = −5.95, p = 0.002).

Furthermore, KDM‐AAge reported similar findings with marginal significance in the two subgroups (both P = 0.08).

Quant industry interests negatively predict objective leadership performance with marginal significance ( b = −0.19, SE = 0.11, p = 0.080).

For correct trials, the waveform in the time range of the Ne/ERN showed a more negative mean amplitude for the 133‐SMI condition ( M = 0.62 μV, SE = 0.18 μV) than for the 250‐SMI condition ( M = 1.09 μV, SE = 0.18 μV), which, however, reached only marginal significance, t (20) = 1.84, p = 0.080, d = 0.402.

The ANOVA of Prime×Target×Group further showed a significant interaction among Prime, Target, and Group ( F (1,36) = 4.25, p <.05, partial η 2 = .11), but marginal significance for Target effect ( F (1,36) = 6.74, p <.08, partial η 2 = .09).

Factors C and D showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08 and p = 0.06, respectively).

These three parameters were included in the 3-factor Simple PASS, while vascular invasion—despite its marginal significance (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.94 to 2.83; p = .080)—was added to the 4-factor Simple PASS.

< 0.05, and the marginal significance of the interaction effect between educational attainment and severity, β = −0.52, t (1171) = −1.76, p = 0.08.