“marginal significance”

The effect on prescreening visit attendance reached marginal significance, with participants in the experimental group being more likely to attend their prescreening visit (49%) than the control group (35%), X2 (1, N = 190) = 3.19, p = .074.

The CTNNB1 -ONC group showed STAS more frequently compared to the Wnt/β-catenin-OTHER and WT groups, with marginal significance ( P = 0.074).

In the fructose-fed rats, the analysis of this parameter showed marginal significance ( Figure 2 B, left panel p = 0.074, Wilcoxon test).

1 − E P was larger than that of random ones with marginal significance (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 282 p = 0.074, n = 26) and 1 − E A was significantly lower (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 111, p = 0.036).

The interaction effect between social comparison, outcome and electrode reached marginal significance ( F (3.43,68.53) = 2.325; p = 0.074).

Of note, ICI combined with assigned treatment was associated with OS with marginal significance (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27–1.06; P = 0.074).

Among the variables examined, OVOL1 expression demonstrated marginal significance as an independent prognostic predictor for OS outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients (HR = 1.472, 95% CI: 0.961–2.254, p = 0.075) (Table S1 ).

At the distal tibia, although the total bone area was similar (22.2%, p = 0.195) and the difference of the trabecular bone area only reached marginal significance (36.6%, p = 0.075) between the TIR/O patients and the healthy controls, the TIR/O patients still had 40.5% significantly smaller cortical bone area than the healthy controls ( p = 0.002).

CopyPasta conditions, participants in the AIPasta condition indicated having a directionally higher sharing intent, but this effect only reached marginal significance ( b = 0.083 , CI = [ − 0.008 , 0.175 ] , P = 0.075 ), failing to support H9 (see Fig. 5 for an overview).

Among family functioning factors, only AFP approached marginal significance ( p = .075), while RFP and family dysfunction were non-significant.

Simultaneously, the interaction between potential risk level and warning color approached marginal significance ( Wald χ 2 (2) = 5.188, p = 0.075).

Only the scores for the Mental Demand domain strictly demonstrate a statistically significant difference between conditions ( P = .003), although the overall weighted scores exhibit marginal significance ( P = .075).

australasica , the transcript abundance of PPT1 was up-regulated at 0.5 h under illumination with marginal significance (P=0.075, t -test).

after training, and the precision with marginal significance ( t (7) = −2.086, p = 0.075).

The main effect of time (BL vs LU) was significant for version 1 (p<.001) while it reached only marginal significance in version 2, F (1146) = 2.219; p = 0.075.

ENSANGG00000011308 from mosquito also reached a marginal significance ( K A / K S = 0.261, P = 0.075).

After adjustment for performance status, which was a significant variable in the univariate analysis, high TGF-β1 and IL-1β levels tended to be associated with a high risk of disease progression with a marginal significance (p=0.075 and p=0.070, respectively).

Similar results were observed in an external GEO dataset [ 22 ], in which a lower ADRB3 expression was correlated with a higher pCR rate, albeit with only marginal significance ( P = 0.075).

On the other hand, at the final visits, visual field defects restricted to a single hemisphere were associated with better mean deviation ( P <0.001), closer angular deviation of vascular trunk to the vertical axis ( P = 0.017), and lesser highest IOP with marginal significance ( P = 0.075, Table 4 ).

The effectiveness of physiotherapy was statistically significant at the 95% level ( p < 0.001), while Therasuit showed marginal significance at the 90% level ( p = 0.0756).

After applying HC3 standard errors, the significance of three key interaction terms was attenuated from p < 0.05 to marginal significance ( p = 0.076–0.091), while the significance of the other main effects remained unchanged.

Both intercept and slope values reached marginal significance for low and high vowels [χ 2 (2) = 5.15, p = 0.076].

If both these breeds are removed from the analysis, cor- relations of LT and LO with genetic variation show only marginal significance (P = 0.076 for both) and should therefore be assessed with care.

WM volume showed marginal significance after full adjustment (p=0.076), while no significant associations were found for parietal lobe, WMH volume, or DTI metrics in the fully adjusted model.

Notably, the middle ALP tertile showed significant association (aRR 3.53, 95% CI 1.23–10.10; P = 0.019), whereas the upper tertile exhibited marginal significance (aRR 2.62, 95% CI 0.91–7.60; P = 0.076) ( Fig. 5B ).