“marginal significance”

EBRT (HR 0.212, 95% CI 0.052–0.862; p = 0.03), along with a marginal significance detected on eliminating hormonal factor (HR 0.255, 95% CI 0.062–1.04; p = 0.068) or the age factor (HR 0.145, 95% CI 0.020–1.04; p = 0.055).

In the RM P+V , the onsets to CT interval and CT follow-up interval were shorter in the labelled HE with marginal significance ( p = 0.068 and 0.087, respectively).

In the CNV group, despite treatment efforts, visual acuities decreased at the final visit compared to those at the first visit, showing marginal significance (mean±SD, LogMAR, 0.32±0.13 to 0.67±0.27; p =0.068, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) ( Fig. 2B ).

Confidence showed marginal significance (OR = 1.013, p = 0.068).

Only the diagnostic criteria of ATDH may explain the source of heterogeneity under the recessive model (R 2 = 100.00%, P = .039), and marginal significance was observed in the causality assessment under the dominant model (R 2 = 81.56%, P = .068). 4.

Among children treated with orthokeratology, the measure time tended to be longer in children with higher HOAs despite a marginal significance ( p = 0.068 by irregularity in Fourier analysis and p = 0.088 by aberration coefficient in Zernike analysis).

The ADONIS test revealed that habitat structured bird community composition with marginal significance (P=0.068).

This effect was of only marginal significance when comparing treatment to the post-treatment baseline alone ( P = 0.068), or to the average of both OFF treatment phases ( P = 0.063).

When the AIP index was analyzed as a continuous variable, per unit increase in the AIP index resulted in higher odds of extensive AAC in the univariate logistic regression model (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.97, 2.60), but present marginal significance ( p = 0.068).

The crude OR was 5.33 with marginal significance (95% CI: 0.99–42.00, P=0.068).

Regarding the ADHD group, four of the six above-named SNPs were found to be significantly linked to ADHD with a fifth one (rs7113016) at marginal significance ( p = 0.0685).

However, the behavioral merit sensitivity was reduced to only marginal significance ( S merit : beta = –0.05, 95% CI [–0.10, 0.00], t (21) = −1.92, p = 0.069).

After adjusting for demographic characteristics (Model 2), the protective association remained robust for the upper-middle SES group (OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.54–0.81, P < 0.001), while the high SES group maintained a similar magnitude of protection albeit with marginal significance (OR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.13–0.97, P = 0.069).

Contrarily, a lower rate of overall adverse events was observed in the non-switching group with marginal significance ( p = 0.069).

Although the FMS groups showed lower propionate levels compared with those of the control group, only marginal significance was observed (0.82 [0.051] mg/g in FMS vs. 1.16 [0.077] mg/g in the control group, p = 0.069).

The odds of HA-ASM in subjects with PA were 10.63-fold (95% CI: 0.83–135.50) higher, with marginal significance ( P = 0.069) than in those with NFAI.

Univariate analysis demonstrated mutated NRAS to be associated with a superior LFS in the entire t(8; 21) cohort, with marginal significance ( P = 0.069).

After making adjustment, household income was positively associated with animal protein intake with a statistical significance in females ( p = 0.030) and with a marginal significance in males ( p = 0.069).

PESA and PISA values in the control group were higher than in the hospital group but only with marginal significance (p=0.069 and p=0.065, respectively).

Its negative direct effect on offensive VEI (we use β for SDM coefficients throughout) survives spatial adjustment in every bivariate specification ( Table 1 ) and is the only predictor that retains significance in Model 6 (β = −0.416, P = 0.046), though the total effect drops to marginal significance ( P = 0.069; Table 2 ).

However, the VATS group had a better RFS rate than the thoracotomy group, albeit with marginal significance ( p = 0.069) (Fig. 3 B).

The inclusion of H B (block 3) did not show significant contribution to the model in all these domains, although marginal significance was found in memory ( β = 0.10, ∆ R 2 = 0.011, p = 0.069).

In fully adjusted models, the TyG-BRI index in the ECDRAHC cohort showed marginal significance for ischemic stroke incidence (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.99–1.30, p = 0.069).

p‐Tau 217 levels measured by the remaining assay platforms showed similar trends across BMI groups, but reached only marginal significance: Fujirebio (0.20 [SD = 0.26], 0.17 [SD = 0.27], 0.10 [SD = 0.08]; p = 0.069), Alzpath (0.40 [SD = 0.27], 0.38 [SD = 0.29], 0.30 [SD = 0.17]; p = 0.103), and Janssen (0.06 [SD = 0.04], 0.05 [SD = 0.04], 0.04 [SD = 0.03]; p = 0.083).

Food handler behaviour regarding maintaining cooked food at a high temperature before serving showed marginal significance (67.5%; P = .069 ), suggesting a partial understanding of this precautionary measure.