Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = .0671.3× alphagold
Two differences from the AFDP results include that the AHB marriage effects (1) first reached nonsignificance at the second-to-last age bin of 31–34 (rather than at the last age bin in AFDP) and (2) appeared to reverse direction at the last age bin of 35–39 such that becoming married predicted increased problem drinking at these ages (albeit with only “marginal significance” of p = .067).
marginal significancep = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Although the state × condition interaction reached only marginal significance ( F (1, 71) = 3.46, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.046), post-hoc comparisons revealed a consistent pattern: fair proposals induced significantly higher interbrain global efficiency than unfair proposals in both state 1 ( t = 3.856, p FDR = 3.34 × 10 -4 , Cohen’s d = 0.454, 95% CI = [0.005, 0.014]) and state 2 ( t = 2.478, p FDR = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 0.292, 95% CI = [0.001, 0.009]).
marginal significancep = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Among rural students, learning motivation was significantly higher in the experimental group (M = 5.35) than in the control group (M = 4.23; t = 4.06, p < 0.001), whereas among urban students the corresponding difference was smaller and reached only marginal significance (M = 5.07 vs. 4.53; t = 1.85, p = 0.067).
marginal significanceP = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Moreover, we also found a significantly lower mean serum vitamin B12 level ( P = 0.030) and a higher mean serum homocysteine level (marginal significance, P = 0.067) in 70 GPCA + TGAˉTMAˉBMS patients than in 553 GPCAˉTGAˉTMAˉBMS patients ( Table 1 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0671.3× alphagold
The main effect of parafoveal word frequency was not significant on all fixation times and skipping probability (fixation times:| t |s < 1.84, p s > 0.05; skipping probability: z = −1.38, p = 0.167), but there was a marginal significance on gaze time ( t = 1.83, p = 0.067), indicating shorter processing time when the parafoveal word was of high frequency compared to low frequency.