“marginal significance”

PD-L1 positivity in Sq (44%) and La (67%) were larger than in Ad (21%), with a marginal significance (p = 0.064).

The polymorphism rs11977526 had marginal significance ( p =0.064) in allelic frequency.

Nevertheless, marginal significance (p = 0.0641) was observed for FDiv between the 1990s and 2010s for locomotion function ( Fig 3C ).

Specifically, in the poorly performing model GLS-2 (“AIC” = 67), Chlorophyll during the “June–July” and “July–August” periods showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0642 and p = 0.0610, respectively) ( Table S2 ).

1B ; Student’s t-test, p = 0.0642, marginal significance).

Only haplotype A - G - C of rs12461727, rs73038469, and rs4803406 in LD block B2 in CYP2A7P1 and CYP2B7P1 showed a dose-response pattern and had a p value near a marginal significance level (raw p = 0.0644).

This difference reached marginal significance ( P = 0.0646).

The Fisher exact test indicted a significant difference between the non-polluted sites and P2 ( P < 0.001) and marginal significance for the non-polluted sites and P1 ( P = 0.0646).

During sessions 1–4 group C10 shows a slight improvement of approximately 2° reduction in the mean error, with marginal significance (Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.0647).

Although these results were not statistically significant due to insufficient patient numbers, QT interval prolongation risk was associated with rosuvastatin use with marginal significance ( p = 0.0647).

A lower Qmax was observed in the severe symptom group with marginal significance (p=0.065).

The presence of chromosome 7 polysomy tended (with marginal significance [ P = 0.065]) to be correlated with EGFR overexpression.

Post hoc tests revealed significant gender differences in trials with moderate payoff ( t 42 = 2.16, p = 0.04, d = 0.65) as well as high payoff ( t 42 = 3.29, p = 0.003, d = 0.99), but marginal significance in trials with low payoff ( t 42 = 1.91, p = 0.065, d = 0.58) ( Figure 2 ).

There is marginal significance between the areas of the subjects treated with delayed ST266 and those not treated with ST266 ( p =0.065) 72 h post SSR.

In fact, a one-way RM ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference for AI within prism distortions (F (1.86, 20.45) = 5.091, p = 0.018; η 2 p = 0.316; 1-β = 0.74, n = 14 to achieve 1-β = 0.8; post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.004, and 5° vs 15°, p = 0.024) and only a marginal significance for MT within prism distorsions (F (2.19, 24.06) = 2.987, p = 0.065; η 2 p = 0.214; 1-β = 0.55, n = 19 to achieve 1-β = 0.8, post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.05).

Comparable values for TMTV, baseline IPI components, IPI category, and COO were observed between groups with high and low intratumoral CD4 + cell burden, except for a lower prevalence of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score ≥2 with marginal significance (14.5% vs. 27.4%, P =0.065) in those with low intratumoral CD4 + cells.

Consistent with Munkhbayarlakh et al.’s 2019 published data [ 14 ], ApaI (rs7975232) was also not found in association with the disease in the Taiwanese and Mongolian groups; however, the VDR FokI (rs2228570) GG genotype played significant roles in terms of conferring the risk of asthma and showed marginal significance in the Taiwan group ( p = 0.065).

Statistical analysis revealed significant group differences in sensitivity ( p = .027) and specificity ( p = .038), with marginal significance observed for the F1 score ( p = .065) and accuracy ( p = .109).

Moreover, the prevalence and frequency of dental visits for temporomandibular joint disorders were slightly higher in the RA cohort with marginal significance (1.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.065).

However, there is a negative interaction between EE and GAM with marginal significance at 10% level (β = −0.140, p = 0.065).

Conner’s Teacher rating Scale (CTRS) showed a significant reduction in inattention compared to the beginning ( p = 0.07) and compared to the placebo ( p = 0.049), and the score for hyperactivity of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) decreased with a marginal significance compared to the placebo after 1 month of treatment with Pycnogenol ® ( p = 0.065).

There is a significant difference in how the Tai-chi group and the waitlist group faired on the displacing test ( Z = −2.28; P = 0.023; r = 0.42) and marginal significance the one-hand test ( Z = −1.95; P = 0.065; r = 0.36).

As predicted in Hypothesis 3, feminist identification was associated with more perceived discrimination, albeit only with marginal significance ( b = 0.08, SE = 0.04, p = .065).

12 , 14 , 15 However, although with marginal significance ( p = 0.065), patients with a normal Pv–aCO 2 cleared their blood lactate over 24 hours as shown by others. 16 , 27 Interestingly, the lactate clearance was accompanied by a lower ScvO 2 during the first 6 hours which together may indicate a higher blood flow and less hypoperfusion in several patients.

However, it reduced the richness of the microbiome with marginal significance ( p = 0.065).