The SUV mean of adenomas showed a positive correlation with nadir cortisol levels on the HD DST ( P = 0.014) and preoperative ACTH levels, with marginal significance ( P = 0.062).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
After adjusting for related confounders, at 6 months of age, compared with the control group, the social-emotional scores from the ASQ assessment showed an increase of 4.36 (95 % CI: 1.55, 7.18) points ( P = 0.003) in the high stress group and an increase of 4.62 (95 % CI: −0.22, 9.45) points (at marginal significance, P = 0.062) in the combined exposure group.
Among comorbidities, only hypertension was significantly associated with long COVID (OR = 1.752, p < 0.001), while other conditions like diabetes showed marginal significance (OR = 1.582, p = 0.062), and most others had wide confidence intervals and non-significant p -values.
A significant partial correlation was found in the left caudate ( R = −.65, p = .0061), as well as a marginal significance in the left putamen ( R = −.48, p = .062; Fig. 3 ). 4 Discussion In this study, we originally used the FOCA metric on resting‐state fMRI to spatiotemporally investigate the alterations of regional spontaneous activity in FLE patients.
A marginal significance was found between SL–SH ( Z =−1.87, p =.062) but no significant difference was found between QL–QH ( p >.05).
Moreover, the interaction between gender and educational level showed marginal significance, suggesting that there may be some interaction effect between being male and having a secondary educational level [206.29 (−0.01–0.01), p = 0.062].
After adjusting for covariates, the group × time interaction coefficient for outpatient clinic visits was 1.83 among all participants (marginal significance; p = 0.062) and 4.58 ( p < 0.01) among those with low income.
In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).
In the case of HPV-positive OPC, no tumor dimensional variables were risk factors for ECS, while the largest node size of LNM was selected for a multivariable model with a marginal significance ( p = 0.062).
The model including age, sex, atrophy, metaplasia, TWIST1 , and GCMI showed an AUC of 0.994 (95% CI, 0.976 to 1.000), which was higher than that of the model using age and sex (AUC, 0.780; 95% CI, 0.556 to 1.000) with marginal significance (p=0.062).
To further investigate the effect of translation repetition, we focused on the two-way interaction of semantic relatedness and translation repetition, which reached marginal significance in RT [ F (1) = 3.65, p = 0.062] and significance in ACC [χ 2 (1) = 22.17, p < 0.001].
The meta-analysis of IPW-adjusted estimates confirmed the inverted U-shaped pattern, with 8 h sleep significantly associated with poorer cognition (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.03, P = 0.008), while 9 h and ≥ 10 h showed negative associations with marginal significance after FDR correction (both P = 0.062).
As shown in Figure 2 , the area below ROC curve of CHAID decision tree was larger than that of logistic regression analysis with marginal significance (0.722 vs. 0.656, P = 0.062), both of which were away from reference line.
5 g), albeit with only marginal significance for this genetic background (Temperature, P = 0.062).
However, the optimal gestational age of management transition for MC twin pregnancy was associated with both the limit of intact survival (p = 0.012) and viability with marginal significance (p = 0.062).
22.6, 10.0, 31.6; U = 72, P = 0.002) and, at marginal significance, in a comparison between pairs of queens from stock A and stock B that had mated each with exactly the same male (n = 11, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, T = 12, P = 0.062).
However, several other indicators, such as the Acceptability Rating Scale (ARS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), the System Usability Scale (SUS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), and the psychosocial impact (PIADS), showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0) favoring the BCI-based approach.
Critically, they did not improve as a function of session (two-sided sign test p>0.05 in 4 out of 5 sessions; note the marginal significance of cohort performance in the fourth session, p=0.0625, N = 4) ( Figure 3B–C ).
The KEGG pathway for biosynthesis of secondary metabolites was upregulated with a high level of significance in the direct, high treatment ( Figures 5 , 7 , p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 4 ) and was also upregulated with marginal significance in the direct, low treatment ( Supplementary Table 4 , p = 0.0626).
No significant difference of CTLA-4 -138 genotypic distribution between subject groups was identified ( P =0.119), while marginal significance was observed in the CTLA-4 -318 allelic distribution ( P= 0.063).
Response times A general trend of faster RTs for correct responses for Go ( M = 1.422 sec) comparedwith NoGo (M = 1.477 sec) items was observed, but only with marginal significance (one-sided P = 0.063, estimated mean difference = −0.049, mixed-effects linear regression) (see Fig. 2 D).
Two studies demonstrated improved response times on Go/No-Go ( Ando et al., 2013 ) or ANT tasks ( Huertas et al., 2011 [marginal significance: p < 0.063]).
The marginal significance at M3 ( p = 0.063), though not strong, may indicate a trend worthy of further investigation and could have clinical implications for the management of transplant patients concerning SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The overall CVAE in a group of female patients with breast cancer who had exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors was slightly higher than for those treated with anthracyclines, with marginal significance (35.9 versus 28.5 per 100 person‐years; P =0.063; Table 2 ); however, there was no statistical difference between these 2 groups in the competing risk analysis (Figure 2A ).
Although some correlations approached marginal significance (e.g., CHEQ Grip Efficiency and community participation frequency, ρ = − 0.23, p = 0.063; CHEQ Feeling Bothered and community participation frequency, ρ = − 0.21, p = 0.097), none reached the conventional threshold for statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.05).