Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Folic acid and iron supplementation displayed considerable uncertainty in their associations with PTB (OR IVW = 13.14, 95% CI: 0.02–8,436.32 for folic acid; OR IVW = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.01–248.88 for iron), and multinutrients also showed no significant correlation, albeit with marginal significance (OR IVW = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001–1.26, p = 0.061).
marginal significancep = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Furthermore, dwell times in both the no cueing and physical cueing conditions were significantly longer than that in the verbal cueing condition ( ps < 0.001), whereas the difference between the no cueing and physical cueing conditions did not reach significance, though it approached marginal significance ( p = 0.061).
marginal significanceP = 0.0611.2× alphagold
The cetuximab → bevacizumab group also had longer OS than the bevacizumab → cetuximab group among patients with right‐sided tumors with marginal significance (HR: 95% CI:, P = 0.061), which is contradictory to the relationship between sidedness and EGFR first‐line treatment efficacy elucidated in several randomized trials. 29 This might be attributable to selection bias in our study, in that patients with right‐sided colon tumors that had higher surviva
marginal significanceP = 0.0611.2× alphagold
4 ), Student’s T-tests showed that the association between parental similarity and hatching success differed among the purebred populations for the microsatellite dataset ( F 1,2 = 7.47, P < 0.001), but not for the neutral SNP dataset ( F 1,2 = 0.72, P = 0.49) whereas adaptive SNPs approached marginal significance ( F 1,2 = 2.81, P = 0.061).
marginal significancep=0.0611.2× alphagold
In these subsamples, incidence rates in control students exceeded those of intervention by 4–7% points (reaching significance for older students, p=0.026, marginal significance for students with migration background, p=0.061, and failing to reach significance for male students, p=0.225).
marginal significancep = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Amongst amphipods that partially consumed larvae, number of partially consumed larvae increased with prey density with marginal significance (quasipoisson GLM n = 45, ф = 0.69, Deviance 1,43 = 2.55, p = 0.061) whilst proportional partial consumption significantly decreased with increasing prey density (quasibinomial GLM n = 45, ф = 0.59, Deviance 1,43 = 21.62, p < 0.001).