“marginal significance”

However, a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) suggested that disease activity might influence fibrosis severity, as also reported by Bessissow et al.

We did find a significant difference in interfang distance based on the presence of MTX ( χ 2 = 7.12, df = 1, p < 0.01) but only marginal significance based on venom type ( χ 2 = 5.59, df = 2, p = 0.06; Fig. 6 ).

A marginal significance for a difference in the number of male victims was evident ( t (78) = −2.32, p = 0.06).

Therefore, the OS curve showed significant differences between clinical stages in the reference group; however, there was only marginal significance ( p = 0.06) between cT3 and cT4.

The effect size was moderate to high, but the differences at Time 2 were only partially maintained at Time 3, and multivariate tests indicated only marginal significance for burnout ( p = 0.06).

Simple main effect analyses further suggested that the natural group showed a significant increase in positive affects, p < .001 and improvement of self-reported life satisfaction at marginal significance, p = .06, while no significant change of negative affects, p = .57.

Inflammatory bowel disease, RA, and MS are Th1-related autoimmune disorders, meta-analyzing across these three traits yielded to a reduced effect with marginal significance [OR meta (95%CI) = 0.79 (0.63–1.01), P = 0.06 using all IVs; OR meta (95%CI) = 0.70 (0.51–0.95), P = 0.02 using IVs excluding confounders].

However, PIIINP changed its concentrations during the intervention from a median value of 243.80 ng/mL to 192.75 ng/mL, showing a trend toward marginal significance ( p = 0.06).

Low health literacy and speaking more Spanish than English had marginal significance ( p = 0.06) The table reports the multivariate analyses.

In the stratified analysis for the colon and rectum subgroup, the MTR only remains statistically significant in the rectum group, where marginal significance was observed in the colon group ( P = 0.060).

On multivariate analysis, DRE findings ( P < 0.001), f/t PSA ( P < 0.001), and LMR ( P = 0.010) were still significant predictors, and age reached marginal significance ( P = 0.060).

The interaction term exhibited a marginal significance (b = 0.07, SE = 0.04, t = 1.87, p = 0.06, 95% CI [0.00, 0.13]).

Marginal significance was set at p < 0.06.

Also, there was a marginal significance with body weight ( p =.06), TC ( p =.08), LDL ( p =.07), hs‐CRP ( p =.07) and IL‐1β ( p =.07).

The follow-up duration showed marginal significance (p = 0.060).

However, unweighted UniFrac showed only marginal significance (PERMANOVA, p = 0.06).

A relationship between colonic perforation, alcoholic pancreatitis and presence of pseudocyst was also found with marginal significance (p = 0.06 and 0.053 respectively) [ 17 , 18 ].

The only other characteristic to differ was BMI, which was 23.3 kg/m 2 in the RSPC group and 24.1 kg/m 2 in the ALC group, which had marginal significance (P = 0.060) ( Table 1 ).

SWS synchrony among pairs containing one visTRN and one PC neuron reached marginal significance ( P = 0.06, Wilcoxon singed-rank test), compared to values obtained from other heterologous pairs, which were all non-significant (right side of Figure 1I ).

2 , the risk of post-transplant bacteremia is greater in patients who received autologous blood positive at bacteria than in patients who received autologous blood negative at bacteria with marginal significance (30.0% [3/10] vs. 5.0% [1/20], OR: 8.14, 95% CI: -2/08, 4.08, P = 0.06).

Compared with the neutral condition, negative awe was associated with a lower proportion of bugs killed, although this effect only reached marginal significance ( p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.04), and no significant difference was observed for force intensity.

Higher MTV and lower ADC min values were found in high-grade tumors, with marginal significance (p=0.06 and p=0.054, respectively).

For diastolic BP, the relationship with potassium excretion was of only marginal significance (β = −0.007, p = 0.06) in basic models.

A statistically significant difference was observed in TC ( p = 0.025) and LDL ( p = 0.04) levels, with TGs showing marginal significance ( p = 0.06).

Recurrence was more frequent in the high ΔPNI group with marginal significance ( p = 0.06).