Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Under worst-case assumptions (mean improvement rate of completers - 1 SD; details in Supplementary Methods), core findings remained intact despite attenuated effects: near-transfer effects persisted for both tasks (Supplementary Table S10, Table S12-S13), the group × time interaction for general psychopathology remained significant (Supplementary Table S12-S13), and the healthy-like EF probability for the WM training group increased from 14.6 % at baseline to 21.3 % at follow-up with marginal significance ( p = 0.057; Supplementary Table S10, Figure S8).
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Moreover, the difference between attend and ignore M100 amplitudes at baseline achieved only marginal significance ( t [20] = 2.0; p = 0.057) for FEP, where the main effect of M100 enhancement with attention across groups and timepoints was strong ( F [1,48] = 45.8; p < 0.001).
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
After cluster adjustment, the group effect for total verbal peer aggression was attenuated and reached only marginal significance, B = −1.299, SEcluster = 0.430, t (3) = −3.017, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−2.668, 0.071].
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
For the chest press, the comparisons between trained college students and both older adult groups showed marginal significance that did not reach the adjusted threshold (trained vs. recreationally active: estimate = -0.070, p = 0.057; trained vs. sedentary: estimate = -0.066, p = 0.057).
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
However, the results of an additional binominal test which explored whether the position of snacks (front side (closer to participants) or back side) affected the first choice showed that participants tended to choose snacks from the front side first more frequently than those from the back side (a marginal significance: 78.6% for snacks on the front side, 21.4% for snacks on the back side, p = 0.057; Table 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Model 1: Multivariable Regression Predicting Hemorrhage Following PN Overall assessment of conditional logistic regression models In the analysis of our whole sample predicting bleeding following PN, the statistically significant variables left in the model were age, surgical approach, bleeding disorder, Pre-op BUN, Pre-op Alb, Pre-op Hct, and Pre-op PTT ( p < 0.05), with a marginal significance for COPD ( p = 0.057) (Table 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Conversely, the rate of OASIS (third or fourth degree perineal tears) was lower with marginal significance in the research group compared to controls in univariable analysis (2 (0.5%) versus 15 (2.0%), respectively, p = 0.057) and became statistically significant after controlling for the confounders mentioned above (aOR 0.1 95% CI 0.02–0.52).