“marginal significance”

The mean number of valid trials acquired on the gap-overlap paradigm differed between sites at 10 months ( F( 335) = 2.61, p = .035, ηp 2 = 0.03), with marginal significance at 5 months ( F (193) = 2.92, p = .056, ηp 2 = 0.03) and not at 14 months ( F (322) = 1.27, p = .28, ηp 2 = 0.02); broadly Site D had more valid trials than other sites.

For 0° face, there was also a negative correlation between the proportional fixation time and the total score and reached the marginal significance ( p = 0.056).

The reintervention rate was lower in the EASL group than in the conventional EUS‐BD; however, the difference showed marginal significance (hazard ratio 0.242, 95% CI 0.057‐1.035; P =.056) (Table 3 ).

The annual injury incidence did not differ by family status except that the incidence was higher, with marginal significance, for children living with their father only than mother only (18.9% vs 13.5%, P = 0.056, Table 1 ).

Decomposition of the interaction revealed that mothers' amygdala response was significantly greater for happy than sad faces of their own infant (coefficient = 0.23, z = 2.67, p = 0.008), whereas the reverse pattern was observed for unknown infant faces, with marginal significance (coefficient = −0.16, z = 1.91, p = 0.056).

In addition, 224 younger AG patients had significantly lower mean serum vitamin B12 and folic acid levels, a lower mean serum homocysteine level (marginal significance, P = 0.056), a significantly higher frequency of serum iron deficiency, and a significantly lower frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia than 840 older AG patients.

Water potentials of intact branches declined with marginal significance throughout the day ( P = 0.056), whereas excised branches exhibited no significant diurnal variation ( P = 0.26; Figure 2 ).

4B ), while a marginal significance was observed for fiber as a mediator of the relationship between Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 and UPPS-urgency ( p = 0.056; Supplementary Table 6 ).

The variable “Type of Pulmonary Resection—Pneumonectomy” showed marginal significance (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 0.98-5.80, P = 0.056) and was retained in the final model despite a significance level slightly above the conventional 5% threshold ( P < 0.06).

MV showed a strong, although the p value indicates marginal significance, association with CA-UTI (OR: 7.300, p = 0.056).

Attitude had marginal significance ( P = 0.056), where those with an unfavourable attitude had a reduced likelihood of participation (OR = 0.292, 95% CI: 0.083–1.034).

However, the difference in EMIC stigma score showed marginal significance between grade II and grade 0 combined with grade I (p = 0.056), not shown in table.

Chi-square test with Yates( correction showed that more patients with NM23-H1-negative tumors (14/25) had tumor recurrence than those with NM23-H1-positive tumors (5/21), with marginal significance (p=0.056).

In addition, 272 younger BMS patients had higher mean blood Hb level (marginal significance, P = 0.056), significantly lower mean serum vitamin B12 and folic acid levels, and significantly higher frequencies of iron and folic acid deficiencies than 612 older BMS patients.

Recipients who sustained a MACE (group B) compared to recipients with no MACE (group A) post transplantation had a significantly higher mean age (59 years vs 52 years, P < 0.001), had a higher prevalence of CVD before transplantation (44.4% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and, with a marginal significance, were more likely to be men (77.8% vs 61.2%, P = 0.056) (Table 1 ).

We found that there was a marginal significance for RFS in ER-negative (ER-) group with higher PA1-nuc level ( Figure S1 B, P = 0.056).

Although the latter outcome should be interpreted with caution due to its marginal significance ( p = .056), the directionally positive change provides initial evidence that positive affect priming has the potential to spillover and influence how people interpret COVID‐19 vaccines.

Male subjects are shown to have a higher risk of presentation delay compared to their female counterparts, although the association demonstrates marginal significance (odds ratio (OR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99–2.88, p = 0.056).

A significant association was observed between the predicted survival probability and the patient survival (p-value = 0.001) in Log-rank test, meanwhile, marginal significance was observed in Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (p-value = 0.056, Figure 2 A).

Only the copula term associated with IC → TA approached marginal significance at the 10% level (β = −0.298, t = 1.908, p = 0.056).

More importantly, the perceived threat had a marginal significance with regard to the positive impact on variety seeking ( β = 0.191, t = 1.93, p = 0.056).

Through multivariate analysis, overexpression of erbB2 and/or NFκB was identified as an independent risk factor for bladder cancer death with marginal significance (hazard ratio 21.5, P = 0.056) along with chemoradiation resistance ( P = 0.003) and hydronephrosis ( P = 0.018).

Urban residence showed marginal significance with 1.18 times higher odds (95% CI: 0.99-1.40, p=0.056) (Table 3 - see PDF).

Interestingly, in the study from Sasaki, a sub-analysis by gender was performed, showing a J-shaped association between alcohol consumption and PWV in men ( p for quadratic term 0.036) with marginal significance in women ( p = 0.056).

However, a marginal significance for glycaemic response was noted between UKMRC9 and Jasmine ( p = 0.056) ( Figure 1 a), which was also reflected by their IAUC glu ( p = 0.06) ( Figure 1 a i ).