“marginal significance”

The SIRI indicator showed a statistically marginal significance between the groups ( P = 0.051).

Subgroup analyses revealed that LAP lost significance across all phenotypes ( P -value > 0.05), while VAI remained elevated in phenotypes A ( P -value < 0.001), B ( P -value = 0.001), and D ( P -value = 0.001), with marginal significance in C ( P -value = 0.051).

However, for L2 listeners, the interaction between attention and linguistic structures reached marginal significance ( F (1.387,31.893) = 3.692, p = 0.051), showing that only at the phrase-level frequency of 2 Hz did L2 listeners take advantage of voluntary attention to enhance their neural responses compared with passive listening ( p = 0.029) but not at the other tagged frequencies.

SLR showed a marginal significance for OS ( p = 0.051).

11.8%, P=0.018), and the ICU mortality was lower in the same group with marginal significance (28.6% vs. 5.9%, P=0.051) ( Table 4 ).

A T-test was performed, finding with marginal significance longer RTs for congruent ( M = 2.331 s, SD = 0.752) compared to incongruent ( M = 2.041 s, SD = 0.471) trials, t (31) = -2.03, p = 0.051.

Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy were more than twice as more likely to recur (HR 2.58, 95% CI 0.99–6.68) than those who did receive chemotherapy, with marginal significance ( P = 0.051).

Although the variable” perceived health status” was not retained in the final model, it demonstrated marginal significance in the initial model ( p = 0.051) with a negative regression coefficient ( β = −0.287).

The difference had a marginal significance (94% vs. 100%, p = 0.051).

The T-score of the lumbar spine was inversely associated with moderate CAC with marginal significance (OR = 0.44, p = 0.051).

At multivariate analysis, only NLR had statistically significant association with TTF, the HR of NLR being 3.158 (95% CI, 1.805-5.527), p =0.0001, although M stage exhibited a marginal significance ( p =0.051).

At 9 months, 43% of the laser group and 23% of the sham group reported satisfaction, reaching marginal significance (p=0.051) as illustrated in Figure 6 .

Although we did not observe a global difference in VDP responses in either group, we note that subjects from Group 2 (R → A) tended to compress their responses for the two farthest targets, which could be the cause for the marginal significance obtained in the ANOVA for the room ( p = 0.051) for this group.

Finally, significance of publication bias in LNM ( P =0.008 for Egger’s test, P =0.049 for Begg’s test) and marginal significance of publication bias in OS ( P =0.051 for Egger’s test, P =0.076 for Begg’s test) was obtained.

However, subgroup analysis represented significant impact in only primary tumor groups (p=0.0190) and marginal significance in neoadjuvant-treated patients group (p=0.0510) ( S4 Fig. ). 6.

Furthermore, the change in NLR from 3 months to 6 months post-TIPS showed marginal significance (P = 0.051).

Notably, the number of high-quality embryos also increased with the hormone level after the trigger, with marginal significance in patients with the GnRH-a trigger (P = 0.051) in this study.

Patients with sICH had a higher TIME above‐range and BURDEN above‐range but with marginal significance (41.7% [IQR, 20.7–75.7] versus 11.6% [IQR, 0–39.8]; P =0.051, 183.8 [IQR 38.3–450.9] h·mm Hg versus 19.7 [IQR, 0–165.0] h·mm Hg; P =0.049, respectively) (Figure 2E and 2F ).

In Seoul residents, a higher 6 month-average CO was associated with lower odds of low AMH with marginal significance (0.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.00, P = 0.051).

A marginal significance level (p=0.051) was observed in 2019 (2020) in the perinatal death rates across marital statuses.

Regarding postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels, there was no difference in the lowest hemoglobin level, but Δ Hb% showed a marginal significance, which suggests that the PLDRH group had a small change in Hb levels (20.4±7.1 vs 21.6±5.1; P =0.051).

The rates of MVI significantly increased with PS grade (P=0.0108) and tumor embolus increased had the similar association with marginal significance (P=0.0511).

In the pLPI sequential -treated NA-eyes, the CECD declined with marginal significance − 12.2 (− 24.7 to 0.3) cells/mm 2 /year (p = 0.0513) over 5 years.

Similar comparison including low GSK3β/low S6K1 patients with the group of patients with unaltered level of expression of both genes, showed a marginal significance also for disease-free interval ( p = 0.0516), with recurrence rate of 21.2% (11/52) in the group of patients with no change in expression.

In the Ac samples, the CD164+ subpopulation was significantly enlarged in the DDH-OA group, while in the pOA group, the CD10+ subpopulation was significantly enlarged and the GD2+ subpopulation was enlarged with marginal significance ( p = 0.0519).