Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

However, the difference might merely come from low statistical power of the analysis, as the subjects were stratified based on nutrient intake, thus, the number of subjects in each group became small, and the risk of the GG genotype for decreased insulin secretion in the high fat and vegetable fat consumption groups were, though not significant, positive [OR 3.16 (0.82–12.3) and 2.70 (0.69–10.5), respectively] with marginal significance.
We did find that in the younger age group (age 50–60 years), there is a significant interaction between screening and PRS ( P interaction , 0.043 for incidence and marginal significance of 0.092 for mortality), suggesting that a CRC screening at a younger age might only benefit individuals with intermediate or higher genetic risk.
We also assessed whether variants within 23 genetic loci that been previously identified in other studies with marginal significance as associated with classic KS, KSHV seropositivity, KSHV viral load, antibody response or primary effusion lymphoma 21 , 23 – 25 , 34 – 36 were present in this study and had plausible signals.
Analysis of clinicopathological and MRI features On univariate analysis, several clinicopathological variables showed a marginal significance with time to metastasis, including age at diagnosis of the primary tumor, LN status of the primary tumor, HER2 status of the primary tumor, and tumor size of IBTR (all P values <0.1), while HER2 status of IBTR was significantly associated with time to metastasis (P<0.05) ( Table S3 ).
Interaction between FLI score and alcohol intake were significant for the development of colorectal and biliary cancers ( p for interaction = 0.0005 and 0.0058, respectively), while no interaction was observed in development of esophageal or stomach cancer ( p for interaction: 0.1895 and 0.4751, respectively); marginal significance was observed for development of pancreatic cancer ( p for interaction = 0.0758, Table 3 ).