“marginal significance”

For the remaining item #6 (attended school/studied) the marginal significance was due to greater variability in the insomnia group and lower degrees of freedom. 3.4.

Significance was measured with an ɑ < 0.05 and we report marginal significance with an ɑ < 0.10.

Feldker et al[ 29 ] stated that, given the role of the amygdala proposed for the pathophysiology of PD, it seems surprising that amygdala hyperactivation only reached marginal significance.

The same condition was noticed in age differences, which revealed marginal significance.

As iodine status increased from adequate, mild excessive to severe excessive group, T3 levels decreased, and TSH levels increased with marginal significance ( P for trend < 0.1 for T3 and TSH).

Comorbidity status was an independent predictor of hospitalization, albeit with marginal significance [adj.

Our findings indicated that a person having more frequent contact with family may have more positive influences on mental health consultation than contact with neighbors or friends, although there was only a marginal significance.

In general information and interaction metrics, although intergroup differences in Video length and Likes showed marginal significance in the original analysis, they did not reach the statistical threshold after FDR correction ( P FDR >0.05).

Importantly, between the different irradiation protocols simulating HPR, there were also significant differences in cell survival for HEI-OC1 and a marginal significance for HaCaT ( Supplementary Table S1 online).

Green et al ., [ 194 ] using the USA National Co-morbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) found only marginal significance for divorce asssociated with later onset of any DSM-IV disorder.

[ 54 ] who found strong evidence of association of multiple SNPs within the RXRA-COL5A1 region, and marginal significance of COL8A2 SNP rs96067.

This approach may increase the risk of false negative or false positive error, and therefore, the results with a marginal significance should be interpreted with caution.

Only marginal significance was found for changes in selective attention in the whole sample with M-NCD only; we believe that this result might be explained by the low power of our analysis due to its small sample size (a frequent methodological problem in rehabilitation studies) and this holds true for all the analyses we carried out.

Exploratory Correlation Analysis in PreDM Group Although no correlations passed the FDR threshold (q-value < 0.05), two pairwise associations in the PreDM group ( Table 9 ) showed marginal significance at the unadjusted p -value level (<0.05).

For heart disease, each unit increase in log-transformed RCII was associated with a 33 % increased odds (OR: 1.33, 95 % CI: 1.06–1.68, P = 0.014), though tertile comparisons showed marginal significance.

Among the results, social avoidance was positively associated with anxious-fearful behavior, peer exclusion, and loneliness (marginal significance).

While subject scores for the primary pattern (DurIV_PC1) did not differ for DurIV patients compared to healthy control subjects (p = 0.19; Student’s t -test and p = 0.43; Dunnett’s test), these values reached significance or marginal significance corrected for multiple comparison when computed in PD patients in the immediately earlier (DurIII) and later (DurV) PD groups compared to corresponding healthy control scores (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively, for Student’s t -tests, and p = 0.05 and p = 0.04, respectively, for the post-hoc Dunnett’s test) ( Fig.

Marginal significance at ɑ = 0.05 was used to select proteins for which there was at least one significant change between adjacent time points.

Associations with CVD and allergy were weak or inconsistent, showing marginal significance in UKBB but not in KoGES.

This trend had marginal significance, changing with different parameters used for analysis.

The barium and molybdenum metals comprehended mean marginal significance level with p-value 0.06.

One might be tempted to wink at these results, given the marginal significance.

Associations with FOXQ1 ( P = 0.088) and TOX3 ( P = 0.098) displayed marginal significance.

For the square-root-transformed imbalance, the improvement of the R 2 value from .14 to .21 did not reach significance, F (3, 90) = 2.67, p = .052 (for the controversial term “marginal significance”, see, for example, [ 60 ]).

Nevertheless, we have sorted pRCC tissue samples and normal tissues into Type 1 and Type 2 pRCC (Supplemental Table S3 ), the expression of NRF2 in Type 1 pRCC has no significant difference, and in Type 2 pRCC has a marginal significance of NRF2 expression decrease in tumor tissues versus normal tissues (Supplemental Figure S1 A).