Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.71614.3× alphagold
time: r = 0.64, p < 0.0001, N = 122; (3) in a multiple regression that explained 38% of the Ebbinghaus-illusion variance: R = 0.62, F (2, 118) = 36.5, p < 0.0001, only the judgment-time coefficient was significant: β = −0.60, t = −6.28, p < 0.0001, whereas the SPQB-CP coefficient did not even reach marginal significance: β = −0.03, t = −0.36, p = 0.716.
marginal significancep < 10 × 10 −120.0× alphagold
Significance tests show that Fourier amplitudes show only marginal significance (10 × 10 −2 < p < 10 × 10 −1 ) for spectral components ( k = 17, 19, 20), whereas phases are found to be significantly different ( p < 10 × 10 −2 ) between control and insomniac groups in slow spectral components ( k = 1, 2, 4, 5, 7).
Keywords: null-hypothesis significance testing, p values, marginal significance, APA, over time, open data, open materials status released display-pdf yes is-in-collection-domain yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2017 Oct 12; Accepted 2018 Nov 1; Issue date 2019 Apr.
The results of the crossover analyses indicated that a maternal supplement of a combination of folic acid and multivitamin (AOR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50~0.90), as well as maternal supplement of a combination of folic acid and iron (AOR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52~0.96) significantly decreased the risk of obesity in preschoolers born SGA; while only maternal folic acid supplementation during pregnancy decreased the risk of obesity with significance (AOR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.55~0.97) in the crossover analysis on a combination of folic acid and multivitamin, and marginal significance (AOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.57~1.04) in the crossover analysis on a combination of folic acid and iron, respectively.
Lastly, the symptomatic OSA group had higher odds for prevalent hypertension at Visit 1 (OR = 1.92 [1.42;2.60], p<0.001) and Visit 2 (1.75 [1.27;2.43], p<0.001), and for prevalent diabetes (OR = 1.39 [1.02;1.90], p<0.05), and stroke at Visit 2 (OR = 1.32 [0.96;1.82], p = 0.083; marginal significance) relative to individuals without OSA.