Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0430.9× alphagold
Only PET4 revealed an SUVmax change significantly different from baseline ( p = 0.002) Cohen’s kappa test revealed some agreement of k equals to 0.38, with a marginal significance ( p = 0.043) between PET2 and CT4 across all groups.
marginal significancep = 0.0440.9× alphagold
Multivariate Poisson regression analysis after adjustment for variables, such as age, sex, education level, household income, marital status, children at home, alcohol consumption frequency, comorbidity of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes confirmed by medications, history of cancer, coronary artery disease, or cerebrovascular disease, chronic cough of more than 3 months, self-rated health status, and depressive mood in the past 2 weeks, showed that dual users with CC and e-cigarette attempted to quit CCs more than exclusive cigarette smokers in the past 1 year, with marginal significance (aPR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.00–1.44, p = 0.044).
marginal significanceP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
The results presented in the paper [ 1 ] show that all reported efficacies between the treatments are not significantly different until 42 days post-administration (except for a marginal significance of P = 0.044 at 12 h on day 0).
marginal significanceP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
12 The positive association with Kaposi sarcoma (OR = 3.73) in this study, though with a wide confidence interval and marginal significance ( P = 0.044), along with protective associations for skin and colon cancers, highlights that health effects may depend heavily on cancer type and exposure context.
marginal significanceP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
Model 1 (adjusted for gender, age, BMI, history of radiotherapy, coronary heart disease, preoperative anemia): Preoperative disability remained a significant predictor (aOR = 4.65, 95% CI = 1.09–19.98, P = 0.038), with preoperative anemia (aOR = 3, P = 0.005) and coronary heart disease showing marginal significance (aOR = 2.14, P = 0.044) (Supplementary Table 1).
marginal significanceP = 0.0440.9× alphagold
However, when fully adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related covariates in Model 3, the magnitude of association attenuated - continuous CESD-10 scores showed marginal significance (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03, P = 0.044), while the highest quartile of depressive symptoms ([12.00–30.00]) demonstrated non-significant association with anemia risk (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.98–1.52, P = 0.080).
marginal significanceP = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Examining the diversity of a subset of connections of the nodes showing suprathreshold connectivity (i.e., all edges in the adjacency matrix showing a T fc > 0.2), revealed slightly higher levels of FC diversity of rich club nodes (0.14 | 0.017) as compared to non-rich club nodes (0.13 | 0.012), but with only marginal significance ( P = 0.045).