“just short of significance”

A mixed-model 2 (group) × 2 (pre–post) × 4 (ISI) factorial ANOVA with Local as dependent variable indicated a significant main effect of ISI, F 3, 114 = 245.1, p < 0.00001, but not of group, F 1, 38 = 2.7, p = 0.011, or pre–post, F 1, 38 = 4.06, p = 0.0.051, which was just short of significance.

For obese persons, the OR for A was significantly increased to 1.72 ( p = 0.0002) and for ADV increased to 1.72 ( p = 0.06), just short of significance.

In addition to past history of LBP, working ≥60 h per week and lifting weights of ≥25 kg by hand carried significantly elevated risk in analyses that adjusted for age and gender, the association with occupational lifting falling just short of significance when risk estimates were mutually adjusted.

The AN PRS significantly predicted scores on the weight concern, shape concern, and eating concern subscales, but was just short of significance following multiple testing corrections on the dietary restraint subscale.

In fact, looking for voxels showing marginal effects (0.05–0.09 significance level range) we did observe an extensive network of tracts that were just short of significance for the metronome task M‐SE parameter (see Figure 7 and Table S 2 ). 4.

It also showed an interaction between context valence condition and response group, F (2, 138) = 2.98, p = .054, ηp 2 = .041, that was just short of significance.

Associations of school and family‐level affluence with perceptions of the school social environment The odds ratios for variables relating to students’ perceptions of their school environment (Table 2 ) indicate that children from more affluent families were more likely to report positive relationships with teachers and peers, and were more likely to feel that they were involved in school decision‐making (with an association with class‐level decision‐making falling just short of significance).

Posttreatment BDI‐II scores were also lower in the IPT condition, with treatment differences just short of significance.