Barely Significant
← all phrases

“just short of significance”

58 sentences · 58 papers · 189 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

just short of significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
At M1, COP values were increased for three of the five parameters in the diseased legs (COP-Area, p = 0.033; COP-Radius, p = 0.023; and COP-Speed, p = 0.004) in walking and one of the five parameters in trot (COP-Cran-caud, p = 0.022; COP-Radius was just short of significance, p = 0.06).
just short of significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
On the basis of the planned expectation that the blurred-footage training group would improve their performance following training, we conducted a one-tailed t -test to test the significance of the change, with the effect falling just short of significance ( p = 0.07, β = 0.288), though with a moderate measure of effect size ( d = 0.47).
just short of significancep = 0.0761.5× alphagold
When analysed by cosinor periodogram ( Table 2 ), Bmal1 expression was shown to exhibit significant circadian rhythmicity in BMSCs ( p = 0.007), whilst Per2 was just short of significance ( p = 0.076), and all three circadian clock genes ( Bmal1, Per2 , and Rev-ErbAα ) showed circadian rhythmicity in ADSCs ( p = 0.006, p = 0.021, and p = 0.001, resp.).
just short of significancep <0.081.6× alphagold
A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with cue-type and number-of-items as factors indicated that the main effect of cue type was non-significant ( F (3,21) = 1.6, p = 0.22), the main effect of number-of-items was significant ( F (1,7) = 6.46, p <0.04), and the interaction between these factors falls just short of significance ( F (3,21) = 2.67, p <0.08).
just short of significancep < .10882.2× alphagold
However, we found a significant interaction between treatment and weight loss in the WLP (p < .0829), as well as an interaction just short of significance between treatment and 0-M weight (p < .1088), indicating that the treatment effect was not consistent over all levels of initial WLP weight loss and possibly 0-M weight (see below).
The eye changes in IMPC were noted for lens morphology changes in both left and right eyes of at least one male and female, but without complete penetrance and just short of significance ( https://www.mousephenotype.org/data/charts?accession=MGI:96828&allele_accession_id=MGI:5494466&zygosity=heterozygote&parameter_stable_id=IMPC_EYE_016_001&pipeline_stable_id=JAX_001&procedure_stable_id=IMPC_EYE_001&parameter_stable_id=IMPC_EYE_016_001 ).
Although this falls just short of significance, the effect size indicates a medium/large effect, suggesting that the recall advantage associated with functional facts cannot be fully explained by differences in how plausible the facts were when associated with the objects.
The mnemonic potency of functional facts.
Psychon Bull Rev · 2025 · PMC12092521