This cross-over study showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0005) between the mean (± s.d.) difference in PECF during IMT (32.27 ± 36.60L/min) and the non-training period (−16.59 ± 48.29L/min).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Serotonin There was a highly significant ( F (1109) = 23.15, p < 0.0005) main effect of genotype on midbrain serotonin levels with wildtype controls averaging 408.3 ± 9.0 and the MTKO mice averaging 476.1 ± 10.0 (Fig. 6b ).
All comparisons between targets were highly significant ( post-hoc , p < 0.0005).
The Wilcoxon signed ranks test value was negative and highly significant (z = -3.49, p < 0.0005.) Thus, HSAs with pediatric beds tend to have poorer Medicare-pediatric agreement than HSAs without pediatric beds.
The difference in TMS and TLS between two groups was also highly significant with P < 0.0005 [ Table 3 ].
The positive rate was different between the two diagnoses at 34% (55/160) for cCMV and 60% (42/70) for SNHL-CMV, which was a highly significant difference ( P = 0.0005) using Fisher’s exact test.
When ANOVA of V T with group (patients with CNI therapy versus controls) and VOI as fixed factors was performed separately for HAB and MAB subjects, the group effect (lower V T in patients with CNI therapy) was highly significant in the HAB subjects ( p < 0.0005), but it failed to reach statistical significance in the MAB subjects ( p = 0.106).
Regarding stage group, our study out of 36 resected cases revealed that combined MSH6 & PMS2 loss prevalent in stage III tumors (54.5%), followed by stage II tumors (45.5%), with a highly significant correlation combined markers loss between and III/II stages (p=0.0005).
The distribution of the prevalence of these strata against age in years is highly significant (χ 2 (20) 106, p<0.0005, Figure 2 ).
These differences across the genotypes (SI/SI and SC/SC) for number of days to germinate and percent germination were highly significant (Kruskal–Wallis, P ≤ 0.0005 for both).
In all these comparisons, the difference between control antibody and fremanezumab was highly significant (F 1,62/64 = 21.40–23.68, p < 0.0005) but there was no difference between the three trigeminal partitions V1-V3 (F 2,62 = 0.80, p = 0.45), between females and males (F 1,64 = 0.65, p = 0.42) and between different waiting times (F 1,64 = 0.64, p = 0.43).
This corresponds to a highly significant increase (p = 0.0005).
These differences were highly significant at steps A, C and D (F = 20.97; 43.18 and 48.37 respectively; P < 0.0005) in the St-Marcellin's process, at steps A', B' and D' (F = 326; 37; P < 0.0005 and F = 11.3; P < 0.01, respectively) in Brie's process.
The difference was statistically highly significant (ANOVA, p = 0.0005, F-value = 8.166), indicating a significant inverse relationship between MC count and advancing age (Table 4 ).
The differences between the L p values at 0°C and those at 10°C were highly significant (p<0.0005).
This shift was highly significant in both treatment groups ( P < 0.0005) and was stable over time.
There was a highly significant TRAINING effect (F 1,10 = 288.3, p<0.0005).
Comparing the multiple and single cranial bone fractures among the fatal and nonfatal cases and applying the chi square test, multiple bone fracture was found to be highly significant for fatality p = 0.0005.
1 and Supplementary Data ); this difference was highly significant ( P = 0.0005).
Comparison The movements on the surgical side were larger than those on the orthodontics only side, but this difference was significant only during the second half ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.0005) only when considering the overall tooth movement.
There was a highly significant difference in delta GST-Pi between these groups at all timepoints (30 days: mean for good function group 1.8 vs −37.4 poor function, n = 35, p = 0.0005; 3 months: −1.2 vs −38.4, n = 35, p = 0.0023; 12months: −4.5 vs −35.0, n = 33, p = 0.009).
WDSCC showed greater expression of E-Cadherin than MDSCC while PDSCC showed the least expression and the difference was highly significant ( P = 0.0005).
In contrast, the singly butylated peptide ( 16 ) caused highly significant (P < 0.0005) apoptosis in a concentration dependent manner.
Interestingly, there is a marked discrepancy between groups, with points around 200 Hz displaying a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0005; Bonferroni corrected significance is p < 0.0025).
In contrast, the correlation between genetic and geographic distances remained highly significant after controlling for temporal variation (r=0.55, Zr=0.55, p<0.0005).