“highly significant”

These effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0005 in all cases) for all species except emmer wheat.

The difference in level of relatedness between breeding pairs and random pairs was estimated at 0.07 and was highly significant (10,000 simulations, one-sided p -value = 0.0005).

The dermatitis in the skin of all mutant mice was associated with a highly significant (p < 0.0005) increased expression of Chil3 consistent with type 2 inflammation ( S14 Fig ).

Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test shows a highly significant difference between the groups for all of the continuous outcome variables ( p <0.0005).

Effect of Dasatinib on Protein Expression as Assessed by Western Blotting It revealed a highly significant difference in LC3, P62 and caspase3 expressions between the four groups ( p < 0.0005).

Whereas the differences between S-HD, and both C-HD and HV-HDF were highly significant ( P < 0.0005), C-HD and HV-HDF were comparable in this respect ( P = 0.40).

Furthermore, in a mixed-effects regression of log(RT) on |p-0.5|, where p is the mean group probability of choosing the selfish option, we find a highly significant effect (p = 0.0005).

Intragroup PPD reduction was highly significant ( p = 0.0005); however, this was not the case for intergroup comparisons.

Two immunizations of adjuvant-free or alum-emulsified immunogens consistently induced highly significant ( P < 0.0005-< 0.0001) reductions in the challenge worm burden.

The results revealed that the relative levels of EGFP protein expression in cells harbouring the pSSB vector were significantly lower than those in cells transfected with the pSB vector, with the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0005).

Posterior cranial base model This model explained a greater proportion of the variance (R2 =0.211; adjusted R2 = 0.185) and was highly significant ( p = 0.0005).

When ANOVA of V T with group (patients with CNI therapy versus controls) and VOI as fixed factors was performed separately for HAB and MAB subjects, the group effect (lower V T in patients with CNI therapy) was highly significant in the HAB subjects ( p < 0.0005), but it failed to reach statistical significance in the MAB subjects ( p = 0.106).

The most striking impact of dialysis modality was on change in albumin, which was highly significant for PD patients ( p = 0.0005), but not HD patients ( p = 0.34).

Similarly, carotenoid content (CAR) exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with biological yield (BY) (r = 0.8447, p = 0.0005*) and TGW (r = 0.7378, p = 0.0062*).

A comparison between the levels of ACA, β2 GP1, and LA further indicated a highly significant level of LA in all the cases of abortions ( p < 0.0005).

Results The regression analysis indicated a large and highly significant Roemer effect (t = 5.6, p<.0005; see Table 3 ).

Univariate analysis of variance with the SBR (minimum over both hemispheres) as dependent variable and region of interest (caudate, putamen), DAT status (normal or reduced according to the written report in the patient’s file) and centre (Berlin, Leipzig, Rostock) as fixed factors revealed highly significant effects of the region of interest and DAT status (both p<0.0005), whereas there was no centre effect, independent of the AC method.

Highly significant was the statistical difference in PWVg between HDC women and each other group: P < 0.0005 versus CG; P < 0.01 versus H; P < 0.03 versus HC, and P < 0.05 versus HD.

Furthermore, changes in responses on the Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, the Diabetes Attitude Scale, and the Diabetes Empowerment Scale were highly significant at the 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month posttests at the p < 0.0005 level [ 46 ].

The differences between full-conditioning and the control group were highly significant whether evaluated as the number of women being adhesion free (P = 0.0005), as the severity score (P < 0.001 for all localizations Figure 2 ) or as the density and area involved around the left ovary (P = 0.001 and 0.004), the right ovary (P = 0.0003 and 0.0003), between uterus and bowels (P = 0.0002 and 0.0013) and between bowels and side walls (P = 0.0001 and 0.0001).

The difference was highly significant for the lumbo-sacral segment ( p < 0.0005).

The difference in the estimated proportions of homicide recidivists between published and unpublished data was highly significant (Q-value = 19.5, df = 1, p < 0.0005).

All path coefficients—both direct and indirect—were estimated using SEM derived from our causal inference model, and nearly all were highly significant ( P < 0.0005).

The follow-up analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0005; Table S11 ) between combined bioaugmented treatments (LB400 and LB400 + Sap) and combined non-bioaugmented controls (Control and Control + Sap) at 3–4 timepoints in the vapor phase and at T = 3 days in the aqueous phase ( Figure 4 B, 4 D).

Considering the influence of drinking water source, reduction in Campylobacter occurrence for using tube-well water in comparison to river water was observed to be highly significant (p < 0.0005) in cloacal swab samples and significant (p < 0.005) in egg surface swab and drinking water samples but insignificant for soil samples (Fig. 4 B).