Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.0004460.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Consequently, there was a highly significant underrepresentation of such differentiation profiles such as the VERHAAK_GLIOBLASTOMA_PRONEURAL signature in the clones (nominal P = 0.000446; Fig. 4C ), along with an enrichment of mesenchymal gene sets such as HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION (nominal P = 0.000227; Fig. 4D ).
highly significantp = 0.000460.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We also found that the inhibition of PAI-1 activity with a small molecule PAI-1 inhibitor TM5275 almost completely restored the p53 protein degradation rate that was inhibited by bleomycin in A549 cells (the time-dependent changes in the amounts of p53 protein between bleomycin + TM5275 and bleomycin + solvent were highly significant, p = 0.00046; those between bleomycin + TM5275 and saline + TM5275 were not significant, p = 0.626; those between bleomycin +TM5275 and saline + solvent were not significant, p = 0.945) ( Figure 3 D,E).
highly significantP = 4.6 × 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
4 × 10 −4 ) and highly significant (median predictor cross-validation P = 4.6 × 10 −4 ), consistent with previous findings that low average heritability of gene expression can be compensated for by sample size sufficient to produce reliable genetic predictors ( Supplementary Table 7 ).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison The movements on the surgical side were larger than those on the orthodontics only side, but this difference was significant only during the second half ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.0005) only when considering the overall tooth movement.
Impact of piezocision on orthodontic tooth movement.
Korean J Orthod · 2021 · PMC8607123
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
HIV-1 infection was a highly significant risk factor for adults with severe malaria compared with controls with uncomplicated malaria (odds ratio [OR] 12.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0–78.8, p = 0.0005) and asymptomatic controls (OR 16.6, 95% CI 2.5–111.5, p = 0.0005).
highly significantP <0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
= 1 P = 0.02). Again there is no evidence of an interaction with batch (P = 0.19). Study 2 Table II and Figures 3 and 4 show the results of the second study which examined the dose response relationship of 4-OHA. There is a highly significant difference between control rats and those treated with 4-OHA, both in terms of tumour free survival (Logrank test for trend = 29.49 d.f. = 1 P <0.0005,) and overall survival (Logrank test for trend = 23.22 d.f. = I P <0.0005), confirming the results of the first study.
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The differences between the three subgroups were indeed more pronounced when considering only children over the age of one year: subgroup α contained 89% of the UM and 79% of the SNCM patients but only 11% of the CM patients, whereas 78% of CM patients were found in subgroup β ( figure 4b ), and the association with clinical status was highly significant for both (p = 0.0005 and 0.0004, respectively).