Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Peptide:MHC (pMHC) tetramer staining revealed a significant expansion of T cells specific for the acute, non-inflationary immunodominant epitope M45 (p = 0.0004), with smaller, but also highly significant expansion of CD8 T cells specific for inflationary epitopes m38 (p = 0.0004) and m139 (p = 0.0004) ( Fig 2E ).
highly significantP < 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While the deletion of Grk1 slowed the recovery of responses driven by both pigments, the effect on the M-pigment response was much larger; thus, in the absence of Grk1, the average Δ T 50 of the response to the M-pigment increased 7.5-fold (from 0.33 to 2.44 s), while the Δ T 50 of the UV-pigment response increased 2.8-fold (from 0.25 to 0.69 s); both these differences in Δ T 50 are highly significant (P < 0.0004), arguing strongly that Grk1 is necessary for normal inactivation of both pigments.
highly significantp = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, if one defines any performance either above or below two standard deviations of the control mean as unusual for each measure, the difference between the number of “unusual observations” for the ASD group and controls was highly significant (median ASD = 8.0; median controls = 3.0; U = 83.5, p = 0.0004).
highly significantp = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found within each section highly significant volume reductions in depressed compared to controls (Input p = 0.0004 (eta 2 = 0.07), Middle p = 0.0002 (eta 2 = 0.09) and Output p = 0.0004 (eta 2 = 0.06)) suggesting that MDD impacts each part of the central circuit pathways across the hippocampus.
Cornu Ammonis Changes Are at the Core of Hippocampal Pathology in Depression.
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) · 2019 · PMC7219935
highly significantP = 0.00040.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, the partitioning around medoids (pam) clustering algorithm [ 29 ] with two centers predicted one cluster with 52 good outcome and 56 poor outcome patients, and another cluster with 56 good outcome and only 19 poor outcome events, which was highly significant under Fisher's exact test ( P = 0.0004; Figure 3c ).