Furthermore, if one defines any performance either above or below two standard deviations of the control mean as unusual for each measure, the difference between the number of “unusual observations” for the ASD group and controls was highly significant (median ASD = 8.0; median controls = 3.0; U = 83.5, p = 0.0004).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Results There was a highly significant improvement in symptoms: PUQE score improved from 14.5+/− 1 to 7.5+/− 0.58( p = 0.0004).
ANOVA analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the various year groups ( F = 8.722; df = 3, 25; P = 0.0004) in the forest zone ( Fig. 3B ).
Precisely, PAL was more correlated with the non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.9767, p =0.0002) than reducing and total soluble sugars, while anthocyanin exhibited a highly significant correlation with non-reducing sugars ( R 2 =0.969, p =0.0004) and total soluble sugars ( R 2 =0.9686, p =0.0004) compared to the reducing sugars.
By contrast, the quadratic term of reaction time (C2) is highly significant (p = 0.0004; F = 26.82), demonstrating that the system is strongly governed by nonlinear behavior associated with this variable.
In the final training session, she spent an average of 23 ± 3 s to complete each drawing, which is a highly significant improvement over the first training session ( p < 0.0004; t = 4.32; df = 19).
This highly significant difference in self-renewal pattern (p < 0.0004; two-tailed Fisher's exact test) is consistent with nuclear Lgr5 marking HF-SCs that shift between symmetric self-renewal and asymmetric self-renewal in response to Xn.
In contrast, the same comparisons in the late phase revealed highly significant differences in the bilateral temporoparietal regions [left Ch12, t (26) = 3.8, p<0.0004; right Ch41, t (24) = 3.3, p<0.002].
Factors showed highly significant group differentiation (p < .0004) identifying 89.5% of unmedicated female CFS patients and 92.4% of healthy female controls.
CfMYB2 (Figure 4E ): A significant main effect of both cultivar ( F = 10.04, p = 0.0012) and stage ( F = 5.21, p = 0.0164), as well as a highly significant cultivar × stage interaction ( F = 8.79, p = 0.0004), was observed for CfMYB2 expression.
This proportional difference was highly significant (p = 0.0004).
Discussion In a meta-analysis, NACT followed by radical surgery showed a highly significant reduction in the risk of death compared with radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% CI [0.53, 0.8], P = 0.0004), with an absolute improvement of 14% in survival at 5 years, increasing from 50% to 64% ( 15 ).
Responses to the QuickDASH instrument in each study group expressed highly significant values ( p < 0.0004 and p < 0.0001) in each of the QuickDASH assessment sessions.
For both the spatial distance as well as the temporal lag this improvement is highly significant (distance: t(14) = 4.70; p = 0.0004; lag: t(14) = 4.13; p = 0.001) when comparing the first delay trial with the last delay trial.
In the stunting model, Factor 2 showed a highly significant positive effect ( p = 0.0004; OR = 1.2368), implying that higher pre‐ and post‐monsoon temperatures are linked to higher odds of stunting.
2 in which differences between the curves, estimated by log-rank test, are statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0004).
The PCC for H10 results was 0.52, but also highly significant ( P <0.0004).
These groups demonstrated highly significant improvements in OS (Bm2 hi /CCL3 lo HR = 0.14 (95%CI:0.04–0.49) p = 0.0004; Bm2 hi /CCL4 lo HR = 0.21 (95%CI:0.08–0.57), p = 0.001; and Bm2 hi /CXCL8 lo HR = 0.29 (95%CI:0.11–0.76), p = 0.007, Figure 5 ).
Compared with the placebo arm, there is highly significant heterogeneity in the BC arm data amongst the three subgroups of A to C, which are categorised by the intake of vitamin C and fruit and vegetables ( P = 0·0004), but no evidence of heterogeneity in the AT and AT + BC arms.
Regression analysis using BMI as an ordered categorical variable revealed highly significant differences in the effect of PNPLA3 genotype on HTGC among the 4 BMI groups (t-test; P=0.0004).
Clinicopathological features and molecular profile of invasive EFVPTC and NIFTP were analyzed in different series of patients, but none of those studies included the infiltrative/diffusing FVPTC.[ 1 , 10 , 11 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] On clinicopathological correlation analysis, we found the rate of lymph node metastasis in infiltrative subtype of FVPTC is close to the rates of cPTCs which was highly significant in comparison with invasive EFVPTC and NIFTP ( P = 0.0004) [ Table 1 ].
The fat contents of the studied plant revealed a highly significant variation ( p = 0.0004).
The difference in the complete sealant retention rates between the groups is found to be statistically highly significant at all the follow-up intervals ( p = 0.0004, 0.0001, and 0.0001 at 6, 12, and 18-month intervals, respectively).
Indeed, ABA3 expression kinetics obtained after infection by prtE and outC are not significantly or weakly significantly different from that obtained after buffer inoculation ( p -value = 0.0830 and 0.0411, respectively) in contrast to the highly significant differences between the WT strain ( p -value = 0.0004) or the hrcC mutant ( p -value = 0.0006) and the buffer ( Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S2 ).
MMSE found a highly significant improvement in Delayed Verbal Recall (p=0.0004).