However, after 42 months a highly significant difference between the two groups could be found (60,067 mmol/L vs. 71,632 mmol/L; T = 3.72; P = 0.0003) with a lower concentration in the active treatment group.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Being the difference between the two adjusted means (−65.08) highly significant ( p = 0.0003), the most important factor affecting the ASV reduction observed in women with HR-HPV clearance was due to the treatment with the probiotic (Online Resource 16).
Application of nicotinic PAM after xanomeline yielded a highly significant increase in peak amplitude (paired t -test, t 11 = 5.3, P = 0.0003; Fig. 5B ), charge transfer (paired t -test, t 11 = 4.7, P = 0.0007; Fig. 5C ) and rise speed (paired t -test, t 11 = 5.7, P = 0.0001; Fig. 5D ).
Notably, there was a highly significant reduction in the number of ASMs post-VNS compared to the pre-procedure state ( p = 0.0003).
A highly significant difference in the wild type mtDNA copy number per μm 3 between COX-intermediate reacting and COX-normal muscle fibres ( P < 0.0003) and between COX-intermediate reacting and COX-deficient muscle fibres ( P < 0.0004) was noted, providing further evidence that wild-type mtDNA copy number is the criti
Results Premating isolation For five of six species/type combinations we identified a highly significant female × male interaction effect due to the reduced mating of heterotypic pairs (each LRT χ 1 2 > 10 and each P < 0.0003; Supplementary Figure S2 ), indicating the presence of strong premating reproductive isolation.
Difficulty in breathing was the second most common presenting symptom reported in 32 patients (24.62%) with an incidence of only 2.70% in Group A while 33.33% in Group B and was therefore, found to be highly significant ( p value = 0.0003*). 5.41% cases in Group A did not have any symptoms while in Group B, 19.35% were asymptomatic ( p value = 0.046*).
Our analysis revealed a moderate yet highly significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.46, p ≤ 0.0003) between Z-AAT serum levels and the levels of human liver chimerism as determined by average human albumin serum levels ( Figure 3 F).
Post-hoc t tests between groups (assessed at the p < 0.0125 Bonferroni-corrected level) showed the same highly significant pattern for both networks: AD < EC, EC > YC (all p < 0.0003) and no difference between YC and AD ( p > 0.1).
The association between mortality and non-elective intubations was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0003).
Repeated measures ANOVA showed a highly significant interaction of treatment and sampling date (F = 18.3, df = 5, P = 0.0003), indicating that the treatment and control sampling series lacked parallelism, ie responded differently to the treatment over time.
The result also showed serum GOT, GPT and ALP in HFD groups it revealed that, no significant changes in serum GOT and GPT level accompanied with a very highly significant elevation in serum ALP as compared with negative control group (P> 0.0003).
Size metrics show highly significant differences: mean Feret diameter (U = 87, p = 0.0003, r = 0.64), median Feret diameter (U = 90, p = 0.0004, r = 0.62), and SD Feret diameter (U = 120, p = 0.0045, r = 0.50), with Los Villares exhibiting larger and more variable grain sizes.
Depletion of SD1 showed a non-significant 1.07-fold fall ( p = 0.1815) in neutralization titers to Victoria, but a highly significant 1.9-fold fall in titers to XBB.1.5 ( p = 0.0003) (Fig. 5b ).
ANOVA revealed a significant difference across groups ( P = 0.011), confirming that at least one intervention was more effective than the others Kruskal–Wallis, which is more robust to nonnormality and skewness in data, also indicated highly significant differences ( P = 0.0003).
The analysis of PdiTw and these confounding variables (Table 2 ) found that PdiTw (x in the analysis) had a highly significant relationship to mortality ( p = 0.0003) but none of the other variables (sepsis, age, gender, respiratory system static compliance, inspiratory airway resistance, steroid usage, the severity of organ failure (SOFA score), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index) were significantly related to mortality.
Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated highly significant associations between high histoscores for cytoplasmic and nuclear phospho-eIF4E and reduced survival in all patients ( P =0.0003 and 0.0009, respectively).
1424, P = 0.55); they displayed highly significant differences with respect to number/percent of MII oocytes (799 [71.85%] vs. 2115 [82.94%] vs. 1303 [91.50%], P = 0.0003), number of oocytes fertilized/percent (714 [64.21%] vs. 1831 [71.80%] vs. 1123 [78.86%], P < 0.0001), number of embryos cleaved/percent (663 [59.62%] vs. 1706 [66.90%] vs. 1049 [73.67%], P = 0.0039), and number of blastocysts formed/percent (270 [24.28%] vs. 815 [31.96%] vs. 529 [37.15%], P < 0.0001), respectively.
The differences in damaged cells in patients were highly significant after the operation (p=0.0003).
The effect of claw on the variance of the difference between the two measures was highly significant (−2LL difference 48.2; df.18; p < 0.0003).
Overall, we obtained a strong and highly significant (r = 0. 76, p = 0.0003) covariation between the number of mutations at non-CpG per unit sequence and the number of mutations at CpG per available CpG ( S1 Fig ), showing that the scaling-up of the substitution rate at CpG's is of similar magnitude across bins.
largha , all of these values being highly significant at P < 0.0003 according to Student’s t -test results.
This represented a highly significant increase not only compared to the precursor clarified RBC hemolysate ( p = 0.0003) but also when compared to the RBC enzyme cocktail fraction ( p = 0.0067).
Finally, as expected, the explicit negative information for females (“Females are worse”) leads to a deterioration in performance of females and an enhancement in performance of males resulting in a highly significant gender effect (10.78±2.52 and 8.24±2.44, for males and females, respectively; t (49) = 3.89, p <0.0003; effect size, Cohen's d = 1.02).
The increases in temperature were highly significant (repeated measures anova controlling for plot: F 1,6 = 59.03, P = 0.0003) but did not affect soil moisture (treatment: F 1,4 = 0.08, P = 0.7880; treatment × time: F 37,148 = 0.74, P = 0.8557) in the period when the heaters were turned on.