“highly significant”

While this is highly significant ( p = 2.7 × 10 − 4 ), this deviation is not unexpected given the very significant differences in MAF between groups.

Finally, there was a highly significant positive correlation ( F = 14.10; df = 1; P = 0.00027) between protein quantity and diCT sensitivity.

Association mapping revealed highly significant marker trait associations at Bonferroni correction P < 0.00027.

The difference among body mass distributions of extinct, introduced, and remaining frugivore species was highly significant (ANOVA, F 37,2 = 10.343, p = 0.00027; Kruskal–Wallis Χ 2 = 16.477, p = 0.00026, see Supplementary Fig. 1 ).

In reality, however, we observed a highly significant ( p = 0.00027) 56.7% increase of CldU-labeled cells in the T C running experimental groups.

A highly significant association with Gleason score was observed when the data was combined from these three studies with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 0.85 (95% CI = 0.77–0.93; p = 2.7×10 −4 ).

The facial lesions were found frequent in young patients below 19 years (38/61; 62.2%), while the limbs lesions were described more in older ages (≈ 86%), with highly significant differences observed among the patients age groups ( P =0 .000273, chi-square).

The highly significant differences occurred between SF of 2 Gy and SF of 2 Gy + RGD-PEG 2000 -AuNPs 30nm ( p = 0.000275) and 2 Gy + RGD-PEG 2000 -AuNPs 10nm ( p = 0.00016).

The difference in DogCV prevalence was highly significant ( P = 0.0002755) in diarrheal dogs.

The most significant pathway (P = 0.00001) related to the biology of the innate and adaptive cellular immune response ( Table 2 ), followed by the adaptive response (P = 0.00023) and a number of highly significant and closely related pathways relating to polymorphism in the Fibroblast Growth Factor receptors (FGFR) and their ligands (minimum P = 0.00028).

If we consider the trends being predicted by nucleotide content as being a “success”, then this pattern (16 successes, 1 fail) is highly significant (binomial test P -value = 0.00028).

The ANOVA Welch test demonstrated that there were highly significant differences between these total BA values ( Table 3 ), as expected ( p = 2.84 × 10 −4 ); such differences were largely explicable by those observed between the cheese and wine/vinegar product classifications investigated.

Eight of 135 H/L and two of 422 TCGA White tumors had overexpression of KIAA0100 ; the frequency difference is highly significant ( P = 0.00029, Fisher exact test).

3M ) revealed a highly significant reduction (48±19%) in the number of GluA4 clusters in the OPL of GluA4fl/fl:Cx57+/Cre mice (p = 2.9×10 −4 ).

In contrast, the percentage of pulp presented highly significant differences (F3,8 = 22.64, p = 2.9 × 10 −4 ).

However, very large and highly significant differences emerged in career concerns, with trainees and nontenured faculty reporting higher levels of concern compared with those with permanent positions ( p = 2.90E‐04, d = 1.37).

Statistical analysis reveals a highly significant difference between the two models ( p = 0.00029, ∗∗∗ denotes p < 0.001).

Overall, the interaction between origin and resource chosen was highly significant (factorial ANOVA, F 1, 32 = 16.6, P = 0.00029: Figure 1 ).

The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated a highly significant difference in MPO expression among the groups (H = 16.29, p = 0.00029), with mean rank scores of 5.5 for Group A, 17.71 for Group B, and 9.79 for Group K.

A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed a highly significant reduction ( W = 0, p = 2.93 × 10 −4 : n = 18, N = 14), with a very large effect size ( r = 0.88).

Patients infected with variant B.1.1.519 showed a highly significant adjusted odds ratio (aOR) increase of 1.85 over non-B.1.1.519 patients for developing a severe/critical outcome ( p = 0.000296, 1.33–2.6 95% CI) and a 2.35-fold increase for hospitalization ( p = 0.005, 1.32–4.34 95% CI).

A positive signal was detected in 11/14 samples, and only 1/14 among negative controls, with a highly significant statistical difference (p = 0.0003, Fisher’s exact test), based on a blind assessment by a naïve observer.

The increase of aversive behavior in response to the visual cue was highly significant in Mela(CTmGluR6)-treated ( p = 0.0003) and C57BL/6 mice ( p = 0.0026), but no behavioral change in response to the drifting stimulus was seen in untreated rd1 littermates ( p = 0.83, Fig. 7b ).

Results: MI was found to be varied, and the differences were highly significant among Group III and IV ( P = 0.0003) and Group II and IV ( P = 0.0007), and significant difference was found between Group I and Group II ( P = 0.0113).

2 ), and they were also highly significant in the DS– group (HR = 2.03 (1.39;2.98), p = 0.0003 and HR = 2.37 (1.0;3.74), p = 0.0002, respectively).