“highly significant”

The phenotypic correlation between inoculation and culture filtrate infiltration experiments using the same isolate was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both isolates 203649 and 202579 (Table 4 ).

All investigated traits had a highly significant effect on longevity (P < 0.0001).

Decrease in Circulating mDCPs and pDCPs in PAD In patients with PAD, a highly significant decrease in the relative numbers of circulating mDCPs (0.15 versus 0.2; P < 0.0001), pDCPs (0.09 versus 0.12; P = 0.01), and tDCPs (0.25 versus 0.36; P < 0.0001) was observed compared to the controls ( Figure 2 ).

Both of the model fits, predicting median Z * MHW and variability of Z * MHW , were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Association between childhood maltreatment and psychiatric comorbidities With the exception of specific phobia, cannabis misuse and agoraphobia, most comorbidities were significantly more frequent in the CTQ upper quartile, this being highly significant for GAD, eating disorders, panic disorders, PTSD, alcohol misuse, and suicide attempts ( p < 0.0001).

Results Patients with schizophrenia compared to controls Using general linear model, repeated measures ANOVA, highly significant main effects were found for repeated measure (i.e. joke type: F = 112.9, p < 0.0001) and group (F = 42.6, p < 0.0001) as well as a significant interaction of group by joke (F = 10.3, p = 0.003).

The interspecific comparison revealed highly significant differences in both male and female body weights (see Fig. 2 ) and in M m /M f ratios ( ANOVA , F (9,50) = 8.21, P < 0.0001 ).

Publication bias As demonstrated by funnel plot asymmetry, a highly significant publication bias was observed in our study using Egger’s test ( t = 4.12, P = 0.0001) and Begg’s test ( P = 0.001) (Fig. 5 A, B).

The two-way interaction of the condition and the surface was also highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), indicating that polishing increased the microhardness values at the top and the bottom surface.

Comparisons of mean T cell frequencies in active and inactive SLE samples and controls revealed highly significant associations (P < 0.0001) with the disease in general, and confirmed the inverse correlation with disease severity in particular ( Fig. 6 C ).

stoechas (2.5 μg/mL) showed a significant increase compared to the negative control ( p = 0.0132), while all higher concentrations (5 and 10 μg/mL) for all four species reached a highly significant deviation ( p < 0.0001).

Even after adjusting for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, and gender, its association remains highly significant ( Figure S1c , odds ratio: 1.082, p < 0.0001).

Retrospective blinded assessment slightly reduced the strength of the association with EVLWI; nevertheless, the correlation remained tight and highly significant (Spearman’s r = 0.72, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3 B).

C 50.3 ng/ml, 95% CI, 2.1–98.6 ng/ml, P = 0.042, Tukey’s HSD test), and highly significant differences in phase III, during surgery and after surgical resection of the main tumour mass (P = 0.0001, n = 28, mean difference M vs.

KM analyses revealed highly significant differences between overall survival times of the high-risk and low-risk groups (P < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 ).

The F = 221.74 implies that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), that is, there is a chance of only 0.01% of the model occur due to noise, as can be seen in Table 2 .

This biased distribution is also highly significant (χ 2 = 21.9, df = 2, P < 0.0001) and the main source of this is the LR–LR category.

Both parametric and non-parametric statistical tests confirmed these findings were highly significant ( t -test and Mann-Whitney U , P < 0.0001), and the effect size was moderate, demonstrating genuine operational impact ( Table 2 ).

Its performance was superior to that of all other primary reagents, with the difference being significant at P < 0.05 when compared to Y145 and highly significant (P < 0.0001) when compared to both EP (RD) and the polyclonal antiserum.

Correspondingly, the present study on the association of the SNP rs13181 with predisposition to Breast cancer showed a significant to highly significant positive association of greater than 2-folds for the rs13181 homozygous mutant (CC) (OR 4.412, 95% CI 2.413 to 8.068, P < 0.0001), heterozygous (AC) (OR 2.086, 95% CI 1.246 to 3.492, P = 0.0056) and combined mutant (AC + CC) (OR 2.672, 95% CI 1.647 to 4.334, P < 0.0001) genotypes.

The overall effect of the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that NH 4 + , K + , NO 3 − , BAP, and NAA significantly affected growth.

When PLM and PLM R scale distributions were compared, the difference in both cohorts was highly significant (ANOVA, p < 0.0001).

These correlations were also found highly significant with p values < 0.0001 on 43 and 28 degrees of freedom.

Lactate AMP showed a highly significant dose effect ( p < 0.0001).

The correlation between change in HbA1c and level of HbA1c at start of treatment with HCQ was highly significant (correlation coefficient -0.77, p<0.0001).