“highly significant”

Consequently, the Group × Task × Trait interaction remained highly significant (β = 0.89, SE = 0.19, Z = 4.59, p < 0.0001).

Averaging over the five production years, plant treatment and fertilization effects were both highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The highly significant differences in plasma progesterone levels between the follicular and premenstrual phases were equally strong for both groups (p < 0.0001).

The need for antibiotic therapy after 48 h post-procedure was significantly higher in patients who underwent open laparotomy (71%) and conventional laparoscopy (45.4%) compared to TSILA (25.3%), with a highly significant association in the general analysis ( p < 0.0001).

The correlation between nucleotide diversity values for HVS1 and HVS2 obtained for all patients was highly significant but moderate (r = 0.441, P = .0001), indicating that both mtDNA regions experienced genetic diversification during HCV infection but at different rates.

However, we find a highly significant relationship between log(S) and diversification rate ( Fig 2 , p<0.0001, R 2 = 0.77).

Our experiments identified 321 annotated genes that showed highly significant (p<=0.0001) changes in expression levels due to loss of the tumor suppressor activity of brat .

The Friedman test indicated a highly significant overall reduction in pain scores across these time points (χ2(6) = 104.2, P < 0.0001).

Looking at all SBT, which were terminated due to exhaustion, shows that the duration of the SBT has a highly significant impact on EAdi ( p < 0.0001).

The 19/24 published experiments with moderate, strong, or total loss of binding all showed highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ) negative contrast differences.

For both pathogens, we found a highly significant effect of the heat treatment (F = 72.4, P < 0.0001 and F = 25.2, P < 0.0001 for P . ramorum and G . clavigera , respectively) and an interaction between treatment and time point at which the gDNA and mRNA samples were collected (F = 4.2, P < 0.001 for P . ramorum and F = 2.7, P < 0.01 for G . clavigera ).

This finding was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Pedigree-based estimates of the mean inbreeding coefficient, F ped , are available for 17 of the 51 populations and show highly significant and strong correlations with the very long ROH observed, peaking for the sum of ROH >10 Mb ( r = 0.87, p ≤0.0001).

In contrast, 135992 and 135993 showed highly significant differences between B-ALL and AML co-cultures (p < 0.0001 for both).

Administration of DOX alone (group III) caused a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in the MDA level compared to the control group (group I); however, pre-treatment with cafestol (group IV) significantly ameliorated the increase in the MDA level ( Figure 3A ).

For ratings of the extent to which a speaker was being ironic, there were highly significant main effects of Statement ( F (1,32) = 87.7; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.72) and Occupation ( F (1,32) = 13.5; p = 0.0009, η p 2 = 0.30), as well as a significant Statement X Occupation interaction ( F (1,32) = 8.2; p = 0.007, η p 2 = 0.20), a group X occupation interaction ( F (2,64) = 4.2; p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.11) and a significant Statement X Occupation X Group interaction ( F (3,96) = 5.0; p = 0.032, η p 2 = 0.13).

In fact, cosinor periodogram revealed that below 74 years the rhythm was not statistically significant neither for Clock and Per1 ( p > 0.17 and 0.37 respectively) although above 74 years it was highly significant for the three genes ( p < 0.0001).

The observed differences in survival were highly significant both for OS and PFS (Log-rank test; P <0.0001 each).

BM32 induced highly significant allergen-specific IgG responses (P < 0.0001) but no allergen-specific IgE.

The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).

The relationship between observed DHW and percent coral bleached was highly significant ( slope = 3.41, intercept = 26.94, DF = 359, p <0.0001, r 2 = 0.24).

For all interactions, the global null hypothesis test was highly significant ( P ‐value < .0001).

In all ages, a difference between Gnrh1 expression in the controls and knockout groups was highly significant (P< 0.0001).

The correlation between the level of expression of gfp-tagged KIR2DL4 and the extent of sHLA-G loading was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001).

According to Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the lack of fit was not significant ( P > 0.05), which indicated that the regression equation was a good fit and the selected model was appropriate.