“highly significant”

For Ireland, the difference is not significant ( P ∼10%), but for Denmark it is P ∼0.2%, and for the larger continental countries, the (negative) difference is highly significant ( P <0.01%).

Availability of oxygen and the impact of induced adaptive evolution as well as the interaction effect between these two factors were identified as highly significant (p-values < 0.0001) by ANOVA.

The methanol extract and petroleum ether fraction at the dose of 400 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg body weight produced highly significant ( P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001) reduction in the number of writhings produced by acetic acid in mice when compared to untreated group.

Highly significant reduction in inflammation in the BBS group compared to the AS group (P < 0.0001).

Although there were no significant across population differences in mean observed heterozygosities (Ho) in both years (Friedman test: χ 2 0.05,5,17 = 5.662 , P = 0.340 for yr 1; yr 2 was similar), differences in allele composition and manner of pairing were evident from the highly significant genic and genotypic differentiation all P << 0.0001 .

Pearson correlation analysis between qRT-PCR (ΔΔCt method) and RNA-seq (log2FC) data revealed a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.965, R2 = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.942–0.991, p < 0.0001), demonstrating strong consistency between the two platforms.

The model was highly significant (F = 140.53, P < 0.0001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant (F = 3.62, P = 0.1228), indicating that the model adequately described the relationship between ultrasound parameters and VAP solubility.

The multiple regression model for color was highly significant (R 2 = 0.84, F 3,110 = 188, P <0.0001), but the slope and intercepts were affected by ecosystem type, which resulted in the following equations: (2) and (3) Despite the differences in the regression parameters, most of the color observations from the experimental ponds fell within the 95% prediction intervals associated with the regression model for natural lakes in equation 3 ( Fig. 2a ).

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of diabetic status on muscle volume (F(1,34) = 119.04, p < 0.0001), with diabetes accounting for 74.08% of the total variance.

Furthermore, an Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis ( Figure S4E ) confirmed a highly significant overall hearing deficit in the Foxi1 N155del/+ mice (95% CI = [1254, 1675]; P < 0.0001; t-test).

The CXCL12-induced increases in cell number observed after 7 days were therefore always highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The distribution of response categories differed significantly across timepoints (χ2 p <0.001), with pairwise significance between 1 and 2 months ( p = 0.034), and highly significant differences between 1 vs. 3 months and 2 vs. 3 months (both p <0.0001).

One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5, 25.7, and 11%, respectively, with a highly significant difference among the three groups ( P <0.0001).

The difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), exceeding the trial’s efficacy threshold.

This represents a highly significant reduction in relapse rate compared to the pre-RTX period (paired t -test, p < 0.0001; see Figure 1 ).

concinna immatures (705 of 964, CI: 70.2–75.9 %) were found on arboreal birds, reflecting a highly significant difference (Fisher’s exact test: P < 0.0001).

Differences in intra-network variability between groups The MSLR test assessing differences in the coefficients of variation of GM volume between groups showed significant group effects between psychosis controls and FEP ( χ 2(1) = 9.13, p = 0.0025), and between Con-PD and PDN ( χ 2(1) = 10.97, p < 0.001), as well as highly significant group effects between Con-PD and PDP ( χ 2(1) = 15.21, p < 0.0001), indicating a higher variability in all patient groups across all networks (Fig. 4 ).

In addition, a highly significant correlation between the zinc concentration and age was observed in the child group (r = 0.298, p < 0.0001), with a plateau at ages over 10 years ( Fig. 6 ).

Each Spearman correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), except for the relationships of sleep with pain ( p = 0.0008), with general activity ( p = 0.0004), with walking ability ( p = 0.0068), and with relations with others ( p = 0.0029).

The mOS was NR, 24 months (95% CI 16.53–31.47), and 12 months (95% CI 9.23–14.77), respectively, with highly significant differences across BLAST-mol risk categories ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 1D ).

Finally, the correlation of AD-SoS values between the digits was established and found to be highly significant (p<0.0001).

This difference was highly significant (Chi-square df 2 = 18.1, p < 0.0001).

However, the time × prototype interaction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the effect of time on L-Lys release depended on the prototype used. 4.

A test of association between pathogenic MBD4 variants and presence of tumor was highly significant (Fisher's exact test p -value <0.0001).

The difference between the treatment groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).