“highly significant”

Conformity index (CI) The overall Friedman test demonstrated highly significant difference between the techniques (p < 0.0001) for the CI.

All associations were highly significant (p<0.0001).

Comparison of gingival scores Result obtained from repeated measure of ANOVA showed a highly significant decrease (F=11.981; P <0.0001) in mean gingival score from baseline to 8 th week in all the groups.

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001, effect size = 0.319) is observed between protein–protein (Peptide = 0) and protein–peptide (Peptide = 1) complexes ( Figure 1 b), with a noticeably lower median affinity for the latter.

The mean skin closure time was significantly shorter in the staples group (5.2 ± 0.9 minutes) compared to the sutures group (12.6 ± 1.5 minutes), with a t-statistic of 15.83 and a highly significant p-value of <0.0001.

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between groups [ F (5,16) = 86.47, P < .0001, R 2 = 0.96], with significant variance heterogeneity detected by Brown-Forsythe ( P < .0001).

Conversely, disease activity (estimated coefficient: 0.7397) and the use of biologics (estimated coefficient: 0.7080) were identified as highly significant and independent predictors of increased annual direct medical costs ( p < 0.0001).

From 2007 to 2010, parasite genotype had a much stronger effect on parasite clearance half-life (p<0·0001) than it had between 2001 and 2004, and remained highly significant after adjusting for other covariates ( F =5·219, df=118, p<0·0001).

This model showed a better fit, with a higher explained variance, R 2 = 0.3139, and a highly significant global F test, F(3,76) = 11.59, p < 0.0001.

Two-way ANOVA showed highly significant time-dependent block for all peptides compared to control ( p < 0.0001, F = 6.83, df = 9).

These differences in spatial distributions are highly significant (p < 0.0001, two-tailed one-sample t test, n = 24, see Experimental Procedures ).

However, a highly significant difference was found when comparing the TB 1-9 group to the severe COVID-19 group ( p < 0.0001), underscoring a pronounced deviation in magnesium levels corresponding to disease severity, as depicted in the heatmap, with varying shades of blue indicating the strength of the correlations ( Figure 3 ). 2.3.

Independent analysis by paired Student’s t -test confirmed a highly significant increase in the percentage of anagen over telogen HF after 6 months ( p < 0.0001), as shown in Figure 1 b. 3.2.

Eighty-seven per cent of markers in the CEPH data and 83 per cent of markers in the NASC data had greater heterozygosity than the corresponding marker in the Samoan data; a sign test showed that both of these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both tests).

Highly significant intraobserver agreement was observed between the measurements of the two 6 MWT trials (ICC = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85–0.97; p < 0.0001).

Both of these variables were highly significant predictors of BU (p<0.0001).

These were highly significant differences comparing the four versus two times daily ( P <0.0001, P <0.0001 and P <0.0013) and four versus one time daily ( P <0.0001 in each cohort) schedules.

Highly significant differences were observed for deprivation scores ( p < 0.0001) and comorbidity ( p = 0.0007) between the ethnic minority groups with almost half of black Caribbean, Pakistani and black African women in the most deprived quintile, compared to less than a fifth of Indian and white women.

Relationship between vHCO 3 − and aHCO 3 − The correlation between aHCO 3 − and vHCO 3 − in the same 5419 samples was also highly significant ( r =0.946; r 2 =0.8949; P < 0.0001; Figure 3 A).

The interaction between the time course and genotype was highly significant (p≤0.0001), the effect of genotype alone was also significant (p = 0.0026) ( Fig 6F ), and in post hoc tests multiple time points differed between heterozygotes versus homozygotes.

The difference between the mean CS for each of the four test frequencies is highly significant ( F (3) = 50.48, p < 0.0001 for dyslexics and F (3) = 45.95, p < 0.0001 for normal students), supporting the hypothesis that the low spatial frequency test patterns, i.e., 0.25 and 0.5 cyc/deg, are processed differently, using probability summation across higher spatial frequency neural channels, than the higher spatial frequency test patterns, i.e., 1 and 2 cyc/deg, activating one-octave wide spatial frequency channels (Blakemore and Campbell, 1969 ).

The statistical significance and adequacy of this quadratic model were confirmed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), as detailed in Table S3 , which showed a highly significant model ( P < 0.0001) and a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.3012).

described that the ACQ score significantly decreased from 3.58 ± 1.28 to 2.01 ± 1.05 after 16 weeks (−43.7%), treatment responders showed greater and highly significant improvements of symptoms compared with non-responders even after 16 weeks (−46.9%, p < 0.0001 vs −36.1%, p < 0.05) [ 16 ].

This difference was highly significant, with a p -value of <0.0001 and a mean difference of 7.8 h (95% CI: 6.0 to 8.0), indicating a prolonged analgesic effect when dexamethasone was added to the block, as seen in Table 2 and Figure 2 .

The frequency of MN induced in bone marrow erythrocytes of Cd exposed toads was highly significant ( p <0.0001; r=0.69) with 1.93, 2.31, 4.63, 6.16 and 9.00 folds (corresponding to 5, 10, 25, 50 and 75 % of Cd concentrations respectively) increase than the negative control (Figure 2 (Fig. 2) ).