Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, there was highly significant variation among the 31 samples (F = 19.0; p<0.0001), with individual mean values ranging from a low of 52.6 (SF 009) to a high of 88.3 (EC 101).
Meiotic recombination in human oocytes.
PLoS Genet · 2009 · PMC2735652
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Cells infected at 0.1 and 1 MOI were highly significant in viral mRNA levels compared to cells infected at MOI 10 ( p < 0.0001 for both, but MOI 0.1 and MOI 1 were not significant from each other), while the viral mRNA levels from the cells infected with ISAV at MOI 10 did not differ significantly from uninfected cells ( p = 0.9).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Substance P cells showed a higher frequency of both sEPSCs and mEPSCs (6.04 ± 0.96 Hz sEPSCs, 3.24 ± 0.67 Hz mEPSCs, n = 27 and 11, respectively) than GRP cells (0.2 ± 0.05 Hz sEPSCs, 0.02 ± 0.01 Hz mEPSCs, n = 120 and 32, respectively), and these differences were both highly significant (sEPSC, Mann–Whitney, U = 68, P < 0.0001; mEPSC, Mann–Whitney, U = 0, P < 0.0001; Fig. 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Among treatments, QE and QL produced the highest reduction in bait intake, particularly at higher concentrations (50 and 100 ppm), where differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for both sexes.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Applying a vote‐count strategy to search for the intersection of genes reported in multiple independent studies with a consistent fold‐change direction, followed by a Monte Carlo simulation, we identified 528 highly significant differentially expressed multi‐study genes ( p < 0.0001; 10,000 simulations).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Thus, during the transition from pole to brain control in task 1, the average correlated firing between pairs of cortical neurons, measured in terms of correlation coefficient (mean ± SEM), increased from 0.02 ± 1 × 10 −4 to 0.06 ± 2 × 10 −4 , a 3-fold rise that was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.0001).