“highly significant”

We found that there was a strong, highly significant correlation (rs = −0.95, p<0.0001) between readthrough level and the decrease in luciferase activity.

Differences in the percentage of eggs hatching over time for the non-sterile and sterile WOL infusions were highly significant ( F = 105.27; df = 5, 40; P <0.0001).

We noted a highly significant correlation between leptin levels and HOMA ( r = 0.433, P > 0.0001) as well as between leptin levels and peak insulin levels ( r = 0.61, P < 0.006) before treatment.

After logarithmic transformation of both variables, their distributions approached normality ( P > .15 for FVIII; P = .045 for inhibitor titers), and a strong, highly significant negative correlation emerged (r = −.74; P < .0001; Figure 2 ).

When all daily blood pressure observations were combined, the mean reductions were highly significant: P < .0001 for systolic and P > .0004 for diastolic blood pressure reductions over the 11-week period ( Figure 2 ).

There was a highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) between the BMI percentile and DMFT, patients with a high BMI percentile, corresponding to overweight, have a significantly higher DMFT number than the other groups of patients.

The log-likelihood test for the null hypotheses that all of the coefficients in the model are simultaneously equal to zero indicated that the joint significance of the explanatory variables was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

For highly significant findings, a threshold of p < 0.0001 was used, corresponding to a 99.9% confidence interval.

focused attention was highly significant for the high performing older adults (t(10)=6.78, p<0.0001) but only trended towards significance for the low performers (t(10)=2.05, p=0.07).

Regression coefficients and factor significance The full quadratic model’s ANOVA (Table 4 ) revealed a highly significant overall fit (F = 15.29, p < 0.0001), with R2 = 0.934, adjusted R2 = 0.879, and predicted R2 ≈ 0.65.

Moreover, Spearman r always resulted higher than 0.8, confirming a highly significant direct correlation between specimens (Figures 3(c) and 3(d) , nonparametric Spearman correlation, p < 0.0001).

KM curves were plotted and a highly significant difference was shown between the two RiskScore groups ( p < 0.0001), with the “Low-risk” group showing a significantly better prognostic outcome than “High-risk” group ( Figure 6C ).

The difference in the least square means of the total score was −8.01 (95% CI: –10.70 to −5.31), with a highly significant difference in favor of mannitol ( p < 0.0001).

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) The ICC values were highly significant (p < 0.0001) for all the measurements, thus rejecting the null hypothesis (Table 3 ).

acute‐severe were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), for both assay formats.

Both these values were highly significant ( P << 0.0001), as the 9,999 randomized data sets had from 558 to 749 steps for ordered parsimony and from 27.49 to 37.12 steps for our weighted step matrix.

Consequently, even modest differences in classification patterns between the two threshold methods and radiologists resulted in highly significant p -values (all p < 0.0001).

The proliferation rate was found to be decreased and a highly significant decrease in proliferation was observed at 100 nM treatment ( P < 0.0001) in comparison to lower doses and control ( Figure 2(b) ). 3.3.

The model-based algorithm picked up 1314 of these missed cases, at a cost of 502 additional false positives, and provided highly significant incremental information (p<0.0001) within this group of patients.

Between the three groups with pre-operative taxis, without bowel resection and with bowel resection, highly significant differences were identified between the patients with regard to the rates of post-operative complications (4% vs. 6.5% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.0001), complication-related reoperations (1.9% vs. 3.8% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.0001), and mortality rate (0.3% vs. 0.9% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001).

Three-way interactions were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

This accumulation of less significant proteins is nevertheless highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and is supporting our findings.

In Table 3 , it can be seen that the model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001, f = 62.17), and the lack of fit is not significant ( p > 0.05, f = 1.44).

Both groups showed highly significant intra-group improvement from preoperative values (paired t-test, p<0.0001).

We analyzed the expression of PD-1 on T cells ( Figure 4 E) and detected highly significant increased frequencies of PD-1-expressing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the tumor ( p < 0.0001).