“highly significant”

An independent samples t- test was performed which showed a highly significant difference difference in the crowding effect between the older and younger group ( t(30.92)= – 5.83, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d=-1.94) [see Fig. 8] .

This regression was highly significant (slope = 0.5002, intercept = −0.8805, R 2 = 0.5580, F statistic = 60.59, p < 0.0001; Figure 5F ).

Considering the Student test (Table 3 ), it is clear that the drying, in linear term (x 1 ) and in quadratic term (x 1 2 ), had according to the most two important coefficients: which is confirmed by a very highly significant influence ( p < 0.0001) according to the tested dependent response (extracted essential oil yield, Y).

The results are highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with a Type 1 match highly correlated with complete and partial metabolic responses while Type 2 and Type 3 matches are associated with no response/progression. 4.

The RPE was strongly positively correlated with consumptive indicators (e.g., fatigue, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS); r = 0.51) but moderately negatively correlated with restorative indicators (e.g., sleep quality; r = −0.45), with the difference between these groups being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Among tortoises in the genus Chelonoidis ( Table 1 ), highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were found in overall positivity and for the detected virus types between the different species, with a remarkably high positivity rate in Argentine tortoises (28.57%, 90% of which were TeHV1) compared to all of the other Chelonoidis spp. tested.

This number is substantially less than the 1089 genes identified as belonging to the crp meta-regulon, and the discrepancy between observed and expected proportions is highly significant based on a binomial test ( p < 0.0001).

Data from non-island world countries provides more highly significant correlations (p < 0.0001) between COVID-19 morbidity, and: GDP (r = 0.616), overweight (r = 0.581), obesity (r = 0.583); COVID-19 mortality, and: GDP (r = 0.43), overweight (r = 0.556), obesity (r = 0.539); GDP, and: overweight (r = 0.601), obesity (r = 0.633).

As shown in Additional file 1 : Figure S1, the correlation of eGDR calculated using this formula with glucose disposal rate (GDR) measured with euglycaemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp in 140 T2D patients was highly significant ( r = 0.624; p < 0.0001); moreover, it was higher than that of Homeostasis Model Assessment – Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in the 85 patients with calculable values ( r = 0.441; p < 0.0001) and similar to that reported in the validation study in T1D individuals [ 25 ].

The unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio were not significant for all the models except that of QIF which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (see, Table 4 ).

Consequently, all these were excluded from further analyses and the full fit to equation (1) but with leaf temperature initially included indicated a highly significant temperature effect ( P < 0.0001).

In particular, there was a highly significant linkage disequilibrium between rs3744337 and rs3744335 (r 2 = 0.72; P < 0.0001) within HS3ST3A1 ; there was also a highly significant linkage disequilibrium between rs2072243 and rs2072242 (r 2 = 0.64; P < 0.0001) within HS3ST3B1 .

We stated highly significant statistical correlation between the kind of the foreign body and radiological findings ( P = 0.0001).

4 B ; Mann–Whitney U : p < 0.001); furthermore, there was a highly significant correlation with latency to lick on casein trials ( r = 0.45, p < 0.0001), but no correlation for maltodextrin trials ( r = 0.11, p = 0.148).

For the green colonies, wood species, time, and wood amount were highly significant (P < 0.0001), as were their interactions.

This is highly significant, with t (39) = −11, p < 0.0001.

From Fisher's method, we can combine these results to one chi-squared test which is very highly significant (Fisher's method, χ 2 = 80.4, df = 10, P < 0.0001).

Similarly, comparing feature importance between all pairs of the networks presented here (trained to predict expert scores, stroke versus control, stroke size, movement element impairments) also resulted in highly significant correlations (all p < 0.0001; average r = 0.61 ± 0.05 SEM).

This reduction of eNOS in histological sections was supported by a highly significant reduction in both eNOS protein expression ( P < 0.0001) and NO production ( P < 0.0001) in tissue extracts of CT vs.

A separate analysis of the two age groups showed that the decrease in arousal level was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the youngest group, and non-significant in the older group.

At the Central Sahara scale, a highly significant IBD pattern (both for Ritland and Loiselle kinship coefficients, p -value < 10 −4 ) was observed (R 2 ranging from 0.066 to 0.080; Figure S4 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between responses to the two artemisinin derivatives ( P <0.0001).

Note the highly significant (−log10(p)≥4; p≤0.0001) differences for the left and right frontal pole, left and right insula, left and right isthmus cingulate cortex, left and right medial orbital frontal cortex, left and right rostral anterior cingulate cortex, left inferior temporal gyrus, left rostral middle frontal cortex, left temporal pole, right fusiform gyrus, right lateral orbital frontal cortex, and right parahippocampal gyrus.

As displayed by Figure 3 A, neurons from both P149 lines and P34 2 show as compared to CTLRs neurons a visible reduction of nuclear area, quantified by scoring 50 neurons per sample, as highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 C).

Expectedly both S100 proteins correlated highly significant ( r = 0.82; p < 0.0001) and reproduced elevated levels in M649V homozygous FMF patients during inactive disease, and a gene-dose effect with significantly lower levels in heterozygous M694V FMF patients (Fig. 1 C and D).