“highly significant”

Note that the surprise fixed effect was already highly significant in the null model ( t (1043.0) = 8.72, p < .0001).

aureus (PVA control Mean = 15730), the analysis confirmed that both MXene‐based hydrogels achieved a highly significant reduction in bacterial colonies ( p < 0.0001 vs. control).

All 4 SNPs showed a similar and highly significant (p-value < 0.0001) relationship between SNP count (0, 1, or 2) and bilirubin levels.

The correlation between change in HbA1c and level of HbA1c at start of treatment with HCQ was highly significant (correlation coefficient -0.77, p<0.0001).

While this was highly significant by counts (Fisher’s Exact Test, p-value < 0.0001), using the alternative hypothesis that the true odds ratio is not equal to 1 with a 95% confidence interval gives only a slightly higher odds ratio of 1.302.

There was a highly significant difference with MyoG ( p < 0.0001) and Pax7 (p < 0.0001).

This analysis showed highly significant ( P < 0.0001) effects for genotype, temperature, ploidy level, and for the three possible two-way interactions ( SI Appendix , Table S3 ).

On the contrary, highly significant decline in the fold change of TNF-α gene expression was displayed by the standard drug piroxicam (10 mg/kg) and prazosin (20 mg/kg) ( p < 0.0001) when compared with animals in the disease control group.

The ability for these two themes to distinguish two groups within the data was further supported by the nonparametric multivariate inference test as it indicated a highly significant difference between those coding units coded with either theme (ANOVA test statistic = 13, df = 8, df2 = 927, p < 0.0001).

Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).

It corresponds to a decrease of 27.4%, which is highly significant ( t 112 = 11.73; p < 0.0001).

Psyllid life stage had a highly significant effect ( p = 0.0001) on the total duration (frequency x mean duration) of all detected waveforms ( Table 3 ).

The difference observed was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

There was a highly significant correlation between EBAG9 and ER immunoreactivity ( P <0.0001).

This trend was highly significant (P<0.0001).

A highly significant correlation between sIL-31 and sTSLP concentrations was observed in both HL patients and healthy controls ( P <0.0001), suggesting a coordinate production of the two cytokines, possibly operated by the same cells.

This is highly significant, with t (39) = −11, p < 0.0001.

In the full factorial model, the effect of exposure time on glucose levels was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but no other effects were statistically significant.

The ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78, with a highly significant p -value of < 0.0001, as illustrated in Fig. 2 .

Increases of IL-5 levels produced by SRDC in response to the GPIs were highly significant ( Fig. 4 C upper histogram, p = 0.0001 Kruskal-Wallis test), while increases of IL-10 production by this cell type were modest ( Fig. 4 C lower histogram, p = 0.0196 Kruskal-Wallis test).

A strong and highly significant concordance was found between the two primer/probe sets ( N =30, Spearman ρ =0.9985, P <0.0001).

Conversely, we observed in the Ptch1 +/− /Btg1 KO MBs a highly significant increase in the percentage of caspase-3-positive cells to the total number of cells (apoptotic index), with respect to the Ptch1 +/− /Btg1 WT tumors ( p < 0.0001 and 42% increase; Mann–Whitney U -test; Figures 1C,D ).

The analysis of the procedural knowledge gain after PE showed a highly significant increase in both groups (control: 77.5% to 92.3%; 3D model: 77% to 89,4%, p < 0.0001 each).

On the other hand, the results of Bartlett’s test were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

On the other hand, assessment of the association between the different pathobiological factors showed a highly significant association of cyclin E with p21 expression ( P <0.0001) and with p53 ( P =0.014).