“highly significant”

The log-rank test for the overall difference among the four survival curves was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no difference in survival distributions between the CTI groups.

The resulting chi-square test was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001), indicating that we should reject the null hypothesis that the standard model (without parity) is the correct model.

Post hoc paired t-tests confirmed highly significant improvements at 1, 3, and 6 months (all p < 0.0001).

When comparing melanoma recurrences in all patients before and after vaccination, there was a highly significant decrease in the number of longitudinal cumulative recurrent metastatic events ( p < 0.0001) after vaccination.

This test indicated a highly significant difference among cell types (χ 2 (8) = 276.98, p < 0.0001).

concinna immatures (705 of 964, CI: 70.2–75.9 %) were found on arboreal birds, reflecting a highly significant difference (Fisher’s exact test: P < 0.0001).

This trend was also consistent in the SEER test cohort, and the difference between different pN M intervals after correction was highly significant (all P <0.0001) ( Figure 2 ).

A direct comparison of pre- and post-vaccination titers of neutralizing antibodies clearly confirms a highly significant increase in both groups (p < 0.0001).

The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences across the three categories ( p < 0.0001).

However, when comparing either of these fractions with the organically bound I-131 fraction, highly significant differences emerged ( p < 0.0001 for both aerosol vs. organically bound I-131 and I 2 vs. organically bound I-131).

The inter-group differences between the human and Zymo mock were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The treatment of SKBR3 cells with rising concentrations of IKK-16 resulted in a highly significant decrease in cell viability (5 μM p < 0.0001; 50 μM p < 0.0001).

The results revealed a highly significant linear correlation between blood and milk BHB ( p < 0.0001), with an R-square of 0.5419 ( Figure 1 A).

However, there was a significant effect of smoking status on CCL20 secretion and this was highly significant in both the apical ( F 1,235 = 24.07, p < 0.0001) and basolateral ( F 1,171 = 12.2, p < 0.001) compartments.

Intragroup reductions from baseline remained highly significant at all time points in both groups (p = 0.0001).

Two-way ANOVA confirmed that both aging conditions and application mode exerted highly significant effects on μTBS ( p < 0.0001).

As expected, the effect of glucose was highly significant (p<0.0001) while fluvastatin had no significant influence on EE (p=0.57); there was no significant interaction between glucose administration and fluvastatin (p=0.21) ( Figure 4A ).

The median overall survival was not reached for any group receiving [ 225 Ac]Ac-mcp-TDI-Y-010, with highly significant survival benefits observed across all dose levels ( P < 0.0001 for the 9.25- and 18.5-kBq cohorts, P = 0.0002 for the 37.0-kBq cohort) ( Figs. 2B and 2C ).

As true for PDAC, SST methylation and expression in other gastrointestinal cancers showed highly significant hypermethylation and downregulation of expression ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 4B ).

The difference between patients and controls was highly significant (GLM with negative binomial errors, main effect of subject status, LR 1,189 = 108.75, P < 0.0001), accounting for 5.22% of the variance in the data.

The two-way ANOVA test proved that differences in the frequency of apoptotic cells treated with H 2 O 2 between the tested emulsions were insignificant ( p = 0.113), while the impact of various concentrations of emulsions was highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ).

The difference in MIC between the two agents against the standard isolate was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas the difference in MBC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.1030).

Statistical analysis proved the quadratic polynomial model to be highly significant (p-value < 0.0001) for data fitting.

2a ), with a highly significant difference between TTS-patients and controls ( p < 0.0001).

Between-group differences were statistically significant from early time points ( p < 0.01) and became highly significant at 6, 9 and 12 months ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A). 3.5.2.