“highly significant”

A minimum dose effect was observed at a volumetric concentration of 2.0 mg/mL of 3 in the food, which significantly deterred the shrimp from feeding ( p = 0.01), while a very highly significant rejection response was obtained when testing 3 at a concentration of 3.0 mg/mL ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 ). 3.

The log-likelihood ratio tests indicated that both group and kin effects were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The a priori defined primary pharmacodynamic outcome of an increase in the frequency of Tregs as a percentage of CD4 + T-lymphocytes at D8 was dose-dependent (JT-J test, p < 0.0001) and highly significant for both treated arms (MW-U test, p < 0·0001; 2 MIU: mean [SD]: +6·2% [2·2]; 1 MIU: mean [SD]: +3·9% [1·2]) as compared to placebo (mean [SD]: −0·5% [1·3]) (see Table 3 , Fig. 2 a and b).

As shown in Figure 3A , tSOD activity was markedly upregulated following WJ-MSC-CM exposure (445.1 U/mgprot), showing a highly significant increase ( p = 0.0001) compared with controls (103.7 U/mgprot).

THI showed a highly significant month effect (p < 0.0001), increasing from “no HS” in May (20.4) to “moderate HS” in June (24.8) and “severe HS” in July and August (28.5 and 27.9, respectively).

There were no significant differences between the treated groups, but statistical differences between treated groups and control groups were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Pairwise comparisons showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between protected and unprotected lands, as well as between partially protected and unprotected lands.

However, there is a highly significant correlation between the average length of isotigs and percent BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P < 0 . 0001, Table 4 ), and also between the total sequence length of each isotig group with the proportion of BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P = 0 . 003).

The coefficient for suspect titer infection was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), suggesting that the presence of potential disease significantly correlates with higher antibody levels.

Gray scale parameters for lymph nodes such as size of lymph node, shape of lymph node, and presence or absence of hilum revealed highly significant results ( P < 0.0001).

Geographic differences were notable, with the proportion of individuals with probable PTSD ranging from 40.0% to 100% across divisions, yielding a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001), whereas divisions showed minimal variation (Minor vs Majors divisions PR 1.01, 0.64-1.61; p = 0.96); Figure 5 .

The difference between these values is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

GradCAM which demonstrated that the sensitivity ( p -value < 0.0001 and p -value < 0.0001 respectively) was significantly different however specificity between HR-CAM and Zhou’s CAM did not vary ( p -value > 0.05) conversely between HR-CAM and GradCAM it was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).

This association is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) when compared to a simulated random-breakage model.

The difference of distribution was considered highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

Bartlett's test of sphericity showed the all-round relation between variables and total sample size to be highly significant ( p > 0.0001**) to proceed towards factor analysis as seen in Table 2 .

This was supported by statistical analysis that revealed that the frequency of polarization in HIV-1-infected T cells was highly significant compared to contacts formed between two uninfected T cells (odds ratio [OR] at 10 min, 1; OR at 20 min, 9; OR at 60 min, 17.9; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1C ).

The correlations between AS3-team members were in all cases highly significant ( P < 0.0001; even higher than those of the AS2-team, Table 4 ), suggesting that all assessors produced on average criterion scores resulting in roughly the same rank order of species (range of correlations 0.361–0.939, N = 90) and criteria (range of correlations 0.419–0.971, N = 24).

Global respiratory system compliance Comparing C rs (PEEP wave) to the reference values, we found a highly significant correlation with the reference value C rs (low-flow) ( r = 0.80; P <0.0001; C rs (PEEP wave) = 0.73 × C rs (low-flow) +21).

A simple linear correlation was also found to exist between the products of lipid peroxidation (MDA), free radical scavenger enzymes (superoxide dismutase and catalase) and free radical scavengers (reduced glutathione); all these correlation were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Examining all products, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in the median total sugar contents in 2019 compared to those in 2016: median (interquartile range): 10.4 g/100 g (6.6, 13.0) versus 11.9 g/100 (8.8, 13.6).

Among the 3D printed samples, the reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the milled PMMA samples also showed a significant decrease in microbial adhesion ( p = 0.001) relative to the control.

The fixed effects of both sonographer and expert were highly significant for either left or right ovary (joint p<0.0001 always, Table 1 ).

The results shows that when analyzing all lung cancer patients versus healthy controls the diagnostic power of C1M, and VICM individually were highly significant with an AUROC of 0.97 and 0.85, respectively ( P < 0.0001).

Comparing the significant hypermethylated probes from CBCS cluster 3 with those from the `methyl deviator' signature, each identified from the 1505 CpG-probe GoldenGate background, we observed a highly significant correlation ( P <0.0001, Fisher's exact test), even though different algorithms were employed to derive each of these signatures.