“highly significant”

This baseline log-ratio was highly significant (p < 0.0001) in the model.

All the differences between the different network types were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Despite this observed variability between immune responses at 7 days p.i., the difference in proliferative responses to viral and myelin antigens in infected and control groups was highly significant ( p <0.0001).

C 50.3 ng/ml, 95% CI, 2.1–98.6 ng/ml, P = 0.042, Tukey’s HSD test), and highly significant differences in phase III, during surgery and after surgical resection of the main tumour mass (P = 0.0001, n = 28, mean difference M vs.

For variables showing significant correlations, a significance threshold of p < 0.05 was used, and for highly significant correlations, the threshold of p < 0.0001 was indicated in the results.

The difference in gender distribution was not statistically significant ( p = 0.9459), while the difference in age was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

By this global comparison differences between sections as well as differences between localizations were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A similar and highly significant association was also observed between enhanced expression of HLA-DR and CD4 on the classical subset ( r = 0.9483, P = 0.0001) within the LTNP group ( Table 3 ).

This trend was highly significant (P<0.0001).

A Mann Witney comparison showed that this difference was highly significant with p < 0.0001 adjusted for ties.

Despite these adjustments, all the RRs for mental disorders in the presence of abortion in these data are substantial and highly significant at p < 0.0001.

Mixed‐effects ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of time ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,140 = 13.02), no significant effect of the genotype ( ns P = 0.1975, F 1,10 = 1.906), no significant genotype × treatment interaction ( ns P = 0.1926, F 1,10 = 1.952) and highly significant time × genotype × treatment interaction ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,110 = 4.085; Figure 3C,D ).

As shown in Figure 1 C, inhibition of each of the RNA sensors resulted in highly significant increased growth of H37Rv-mCherry as detected by IFC/ImageStream relative to its control cell line at 24 h (RIG-I: p < 0.0001; MDA5: p < 0.0001; MAVS: p = 0.002) or 48 h (RIG-I: p < 0.0001; MDA5: p < 0.0001; MAVS: p = 0.0008) post-infection.

C comparisons (comparing 164 values) gave a low, but highly significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.37, P < 0.0001) between the data obtained by the Affymetrix and PCR arrays.

In all the mechanical properties tested, a highly significant difference was observed in the mean values between and within the groups ( p < 0.0001).

A one-way mixed model was applied with mean pain ratings as the response, the result showed that the contrasts HC and LC condition was highly significant (p<0.0001).

This difference was determined to be highly significant (p<.0001; number of trials = 1500; number of successes = 1139) using a binomial test and therefore the accuracy in estimating land cover actually increased in the final stages of the competition.

Results There was a highly significant Kendall rank order correlation between cataract scores for the two eyes (Kendall τ = 0.48, P <0.0001), this score was significantly repeatable ( R = 0.72 (SE = 0.02), F = 6.09, d.f. = 1077, 1144, r 2 = 0.85, P <0.0001), and, we used the mean score in subsequent analyses.

The results showed that there was a statistically highly significant difference among isolates in the percentage of mean germination (F=54.6; DF=14; P<0.0001).

If a multimodal approach is adopted using the ratio of EZ and hyperAF rates, a highly significant relationship is seen ( r 2 = 0.44, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 3C ).

The correlation of the DEC1-dependent signature was highly significant with the CD28-regulated gene list (P < 0.0001). 72% of the genes up-regulated by DEC1 were also up-regulated by CD28 co-stimulation, whereas 83% of the DEC1 down-regulated genes were again down-regulated by CD28 signaling ( Fig. 7, C and D , top).

Accordingly, spearman correlations between p-S65-Ub and PRKN protein levels in WT, Prkn +/- , and prkn -/- brains were positive and highly significant ( r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) (Fig.

A highly significant correlation between CNP and TNF-α (p<0.0001) was detected in cardiac tissue ( Fig. 6 ).

S3 and S5 gave highly significant increase in solubility with p < 0.0001 with no significant difference between them ( p = 0.6891, > 0.05), which means this method was more efficient in the complex formation.

These differences were highly significant by applying generalized linear model ( p < .0001).