“highly significant”

A highly significant correlation was observed between the individual T/N ratios of 11 C-4DST and 18 F-FLT ( r = 0.79, P = 0.0001).

An excellent correlation was found among the four retina specialists for determination of each patient’s LINCL ophthalmic severity score, where all correlations were highly significant (all Kendall’s tau > 0.87, p<0.0001).

All of the interactions are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

4 , it comes out that the existence of a highly significant difference (p <0.0001; α = 0.05) between the proportions of the different professions; meaning that occupations strongly influence the profiles of infant flours users.

2 ) Highly significant heterogeneity was present among the 22 studies: Cochran Q = 278.5 ( P = 0.0001); I 2 = 92.5% (95% CI: 89.9–94.4); Kendall’s Tau = 0.004 ( P = 0.9775).

C comparisons (comparing 164 values) gave a low, but highly significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.37, P < 0.0001) between the data obtained by the Affymetrix and PCR arrays.

The improvement with training from the first two sessions (0.75) to the last two sessions (0.83) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This difference between Austrian and Chinese beetles was highly significant ( t -test, p < 0.0001).

6 ) is highly significant (t-test, P<0.0001) ( Fig. 7 ).

However, a strong and highly significant inverse correlation between percentage of Tregs and Tmax emerged (p<0.0001, r = −0.56) ( Figure 3a ).

Likewise, biofilm amount of each strain did not change significantly during assay ( P > 0.05), whereas highly significant ( P < 0.0001) differences in biofilm biomass were found among the assayed strains.

To statistically confirm this trend, a Jonckheere–Terpstra test was performed, revealing a highly significant positive trend between LT4 dosage and FT4 levels (JT = 2,029,623, P < 0.0001).

The primary analysis showed a highly significant treatment effect overall across all four time points (−17.4 mm; 95% confidence interval: −22.3 to −12.5 mm; p < 0.0001).

This shows that the RC is lower (fewer samples and lower ADAb titre in this model) but continues to be highly significant [RC −3.70 (95% CI: −5.01 to −2.32), P < 0.0001].

Regarding schistosomiasis, cysteine peptidases, such as papain, Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin B1 (SmCB1) and cathepsin L3 (SmCL3) and Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1) do not induce allergic reactions in mice or hamsters and were shown instead to elicit reproducible and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) reduction of 50–65% in challenge S. mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infection, via generation of polarized (papain, SmCL3, FhCL)- or predominant (SmCB1) type 2 responses involving release of TSLP, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and generation of IgG1 antibodies [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] .

5 E) levels in the tumor tissues of the PAC treatment group compared to the control group, with both lipid peroxidation and Fe 2+ levels exhibiting an increase of over 10 times that of the control group, indicating a highly significant statistical distinction between the two groups (p < 0.0001).

Firstly, the gesture-only conditions (blurred, pointing, give-me gestures) were statistically investigated in a 2-way ANOVA (Time window × Gesture type) calculated across the three time windows, which revealed a highly significant interaction (F(4, 96) = 8.47, ε = 0.66, p = 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.26).

In contrast, a highly significant difference ( p <0.0001) was detected in the frequency of mspA phase ON (tract length of 6, 9 or 12Cs) strains in the carriage versus invasive collections ( Table 6 ), with mspA being significantly more often ON in invasive isolates compared to carriage isolates (69.2% compared to 50.0%).

Two-port ECTR demonstrated an exceptionally large and highly significant effect (SMD = −4.47, 95% CI: −5.67 to −3.26; p < 0.0001), suggesting a profound reduction in symptom severity.

Follow-up (bonferroni corrected) comparisons revealed that this effect was driven by a highly significant effect of sound within the human made target group ( p < .0001).

Thus, unpaired t -test reported a highly significant difference between the surface characteristics of control arch-wires and the test arch-wires ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 1 and Figure 4 ].

Non-musicians showed highly significant correlations at the group level for all pulse clarity-driven ICs ( p < 0.0001) except for IC 50 ( p = 0.06), whereas musicians exhibited significant correlations only for the four highest model orders [IC 70 ( p < 0.05), IC 80 ( p < 0.01), IC 90 ( p < 0.001), and IC 100 ( p < 0.005); see Figure 6B ].

Correlation of results of two ELISpot assays at a given time point was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Indeed, we observed complete or near complete LD for all pairs of SNPs with sufficiently high frequencies (only alleles with frequencies in the range 0.05–0.95 were included in the analysis because estimates of LD for low-frequency alleles in small samples are not informative): 85% of all pairwise r 2 values were highly significant (Exact p -value <0.0001).

Additional association analyses of LCN2 and MMSE scores including all groups with cerebrovascular disease (SVDND, VCIND, and VaD) showed highly significant negative correlations in cohort 1 (cc = −0.55, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3c , Spearman correlation test) and cohort 4 (cc = −0.56, p = 0.008, Fig. 3d , Spearman correlation test).