“highly significant”

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

Overall there was a highly significant difference between the two groups of donors as determined by two‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 ).

The risk ratios and mean ± standard deviations of biomarkers, anatomical features, and outcome measures of the experimental subjects were highly significant compared to controls ( p < 0.0001).

Contrary to the negative correlation, a highly significant positive correlation (p<0.0001) found in these analyses.

When WT ovules were used, 59% of the assays showed pollen tubes growing toward WT ovules ( n =80), while only 10% of the pollen tubes grew toward the Scfrk1 -S1 ovules ( n =60), giving a highly significant P <0.0001 value in a two-sample binomial test.

Among the individual parameters, biomass (A), sonication amplitude (B), and sonication time (C) all exhibit highly significant effects on protein extraction yield ( p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA indicated highly significant differences between the Chatino, Chontal, and Chinanteco groups regarding the number of mushrooms they know and use ( F = 10.9, p < 0.0001).

This difference in fecundity between early and late female breeders was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Both speed differences between the tests were statistically highly significant (MWU test, U[s] = 109 and U[CPS] = 33; p < 0.0001).

obese was highly significant, **** p < 0.0001, whereas obesity-resistant vs . obese was also highly significant (**** p < 0.0001, TMCT), and no significant differences between lean and obesity-resistant mice were observed (ns, TMCT).

Administration of DOX alone (group III) caused a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in the MDA level compared to the control group (group I); however, pre-treatment with cafestol (group IV) significantly ameliorated the increase in the MDA level ( Figure 3A ).

The highly significant level was determined at p < 0.0001.

In KOS infected TG, all (100%) of the 40 TG collected were reactivated, while in KOS-Rid1 mice none (0%) of the 40 TG collected were reactivated and these differences were highly significant ( Fig 1D ; p<0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).

In leprosy nerves, the extent of LAM and MAC immunoreactivity was robust and significantly higher in multibacillary compared to paucibacillary donors ( p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively), with a highly significant association between LAM and MAC in the diseased samples ( r = 0.9601, p = 0.0001).

They also found highly significant differences between the methods of endogenous amino acid correction of 2.8% ( P < 0.0001 by our re-calculation, Table 4 ).

Marker-trait associations of early vigor in wheat landraces For the water deficit condition, 54 highly significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified across all chromosomes with the FarmCPU method at a significance level of –log 10 P- value >4 ( Table 2 ).

The difference between the cumulative incidence curves is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001 hypertensive aged vs. hypertensive young mice, P < 0.001 hypertensive aged vs. resveratrol-treated hypertensive aged mice; Mantel–Cox log-rank test).

This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.

An F test confirmed the obtained regression model, and the results showed that the model was highly significant (P-value < 0.0001), whereas its lack of fit was not significant (P value = 0.6178).

Comparing all of these subjects, a highly significant correlation [ N = 34; R = (−)0.68; p < 0.0001] was found between RBC deformability and the level of HDPs.

Overall genetic structure Control region and microsatellites AMOVAs with the CR and Msat datasets showed highly significant deviations from panmictic population conditions (Φ ST = 0.096, P < 0.0001; mean D est = 0.17; F ST = 0.015, P < 0.0001).

The Age-Group effect was highly significant ( F (6,1462) = 62.94, p < 0.0001, partial ω 2 = 0.20): CRT latencies increased with Age-group (see Table 2 : from 476 ms in the youngest group to 595 ms in the oldest).

For frailty in WHAS, the model form does not allow the calculation of a simple R 2 , but the effect of PCA1 remains highly significant with or without control for age ( p <0.0001), and declines from 0.146 to 0.104 frailty criteria.

These observations were statistically validated with a Kruskal-Wallis H test, which showed a highly significant result (P < 0.0001), confirming that the medians of the ratios differed significantly across the four phases.

Drug concentration (X 2 ) The concentration of IVM in the liquid dispersion had a highly significant main effect ( p < 0.0001) on the PDI values.