“highly significant”

Results it was observed that, in the osteoarthritic hips, hip neck fracture and aseptic necrosis, the degree of agreement was highly significant (p < 0.0001), in the measurements of anteversion and inclination angles, among the three assessments, from intra as well as inter-observers.

This difference in BMI-associated trends in risk for ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke was highly significant ( figure 1 , p < 0.0001).

In particular, the difference between infected animals that received JWH-133 or not was highly significant for endpoints (p < 0.0001) and branch length (p < 0.001).

There was a strong and highly significant correlation between virus titers measured by TC-LDA and qRT-PCR (R 2 = 0.89, P <0.0001; Figure 5 ) and the slope of the line indicates that there is approximately a 1∶1 relationship between the number of infectious virus particles and virus genome equivalents identified in these serum samples.

Likewise, there was a highly significant (p<0.0001) reduction in the total number of PCNA foci over the 16-hour timeframe with the average median number of foci only 2351 in HU cells compared to 6125 in controls (Supplementary Figure S4C ).

As the starting ratio of the biofilm strain determines the ultimate possible change in the ending frequency, starting ratio was included as an effect in the model and was highly significant (β = −0.62; p < .0001).

1 X 2 2 − 4.27 X 3 2 − 4.82 X 4 2 − 6.24 X 1 X 2 + 0.8271 X 1 X 3 − 1.51 X 1 X 4 − 2.48 X 2 X 3 − 1.58 X 2 X 4 + 0.0910 X 3 X 4 + 2.15 X 1 + 6.65 X 2 − 2.00 X 3 + 0.7997 X 4 + 80.28 The regression analysis of variance (ANOVA) results (Supplementary Table 2 ) demonstrate that the regression model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), confirming its reliability.

There are highly significant age differences across all comparisons: HC vs. pMS ( p < 0.0001), HC vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001), and pMS vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001).

While both monotherapies induced a modest increase in CD69 expression, the combination treatment led to highly significant upregulation compared with the vehicle ( p < 0.0001 for CD4+, p = 0.0005 for CD8+, Dunn’s test).

(2003) [ 57 ] documented a substantial and highly significant (p<0.0001) increase in hospitalization of replacement-fed infants compared with their breast-fed counterparts; several limitations were mentioned regarding the interpretation of the data.

As a cross-check, calculated (via DIC and TA) and directly measured pH values were compared and showed a highly significant correlation and no outliers (pH (total scale) = 0.9176 pH (NBS) +0.5453; r 2 = 0.99; p<0.0001).

Quantification of GS-IB4 and CD31 CNV area demonstrated a highly significant reduction in the median lesion area of 45.6 [27.1–59.4]% ( p = 0.0001) and 45.1 [24.3–60.2]% ( p = 0.0006), respectively, in 13-12AB-PEDF-injected eyes compared with S1-S2AB-AsRed-injected control eyes ( Figures 5 B–5D).

Differences in allele frequencies of male and female bed bugs between the four field strains SK, OB, LB, and AS and the susceptible UBA strain were found to be statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001, for all strains).

Considering all five species, the difference between the years is highly significant for O. kevoensis (χ 2 = 69.5, P < 0.0001), whereas in O. inclinans the difference is only marginally so (χ 2 = 4.6, P = 0.03).

In all cases, the slope of the regression was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the R 2 was between 0.36 and 0.39.

3 F) compared to non-demented control brains, such that a highly significant negative correlation between ACAN+ PNNs and Thio-S+ plaques was observed across unaffected and diseased tissue samples (Spearman's r =−0.49, p <0.0001; Fig. 3 G).

When comparing “periphery” and “interior” patterns, the difference in radial distribution of DAO-5 was highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, p <0.0001).

Moreover, when plastic particles used in toxicity testing were classified into 4 size classes, the effect of particle size on toxicity was highly significant (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), and the dependence of safe concentration (HC 5 ) on particle size was even more remarkable, with a slope b = 1.21 according to the equation: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\log \;{\text{HC}}_{5} = 1.21\;\log \;{\text{S}}{-}2.10$$\end{document} log HC 5 = 1.21 log S - 2.10 where S is the mean particle size (μm) for each size class (r 2 = 0.92, n = 4).

When we compare the average impact factor of the 56 scientific publications that were echoed by newspapers (17.1±2.1 mean ± SEM) to that of the 56 publications that were not echoed (6.4±1.0 mean ± SEM), the difference is highly significant (unpaired t test: p<0.0001).

Risk Group As shown in Table 3 , the main effect of risk group was highly significant [ F = 20.83; p < 0.0001], showing that HR subjects [2.96 (0.01)] manifested significantly lower theta power than their LR counterparts [3.10 (0.03)].

The difference was statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 31.36, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

Bulb firmness The analysis of variance revealed that the main effects of variety, storage duration and preharvest treatment were highly significant ( P < 0.0001 ) on bulb firmness.

A highly significant increase in area under the ROC curve from ∼0.944 to >0.97 (p<0.0001) was noted upon addition of the ‘new’ tests and thereby established their positive impact on TBM diagnosis ( Figure 4 ).

These two tests reveal a highly significant difference (P< 0.0001) between the values of wing-shaped Procrustes in the females of the three species ( Table 3 ).

The model and coefficients were highly significant (model adjusted R-squared = 0.64, F-statistic = 69.74 on 9 and 334 DF, p < 0.0001).